Having mild pectus excavatum should not prevent you from having a good breast augmentation outcome you had a. If anything, it gives the impression of more defined cleavage. As a general statement breast, augmentation outcomes are based on three variables. The first is patient candidacy. Frontal picture would be more helpful in order to make an assessment. Variables that can affect patient candidacy include breast position on the chest wall, breast shape, breast divergence, and to some degree the shape of your sternum. A front picture would allow us to assess breast and potential breast divergence a little better. Individuals who have variables that make them less than an ideal candidate for breast documentation like significant breast divergence may have these variables amplified with the projection of implants. To help that for the best provider and get a good understanding of what your results are likely to look like I recommend asking providers to open up their portfolio and show you their entire collection of before, and after pictures of previous patients who had similar body characteristics get paragraph bring pictures of yourself to use as a reference during the consultation, especially when reviewing before, and after pictures. by seeing pictures of previous patient who had similar breast characteristics, you should get a pretty good understanding of what your results are going to look like. This process also works to that providers in regards to skill and experience. Providers who are unable to show you quality collection of before, and after pictures of previous patients with similar characteristics May have insufficient experience. The second variable is implant selection in regards to shape size and type. Surgeon will have their own way of guiding patients through the implant selection process. Some plastic surgeons do this better than others. The third variable is the surgeons ability to put the implants in the correct anatomic location. Outcomes like implants riding high or implants eventually bottom out are to implant Placement. I recommend patients have a few consultations to help them find the right provider. In the end provider selection is probably the most important variable. In the hands of the right provider implant selection should be fairly effortless and straightforward. What results are likely to look like should be conveyed accurately. The chance of needing revision surgery is going to be reduced. As a general statement, anytime, excessively large implants are used the chance of undesirable side effect, complications and need for revision surgery is going to be increased. Best, Mats Hagstrom MD