My doctor told me that a periareolar incision work work better for me than a inframammary incision because my breast have a natural "droop" (not saggy). I've searched online to find that information but I just don't see it. I would prefer inframammary to decrease risk of capsular contraction and he did say he'd to that if I wanted to, but I just want the best result. Any insight?
Answer: Periareolar incision vs inframammary incision? Thank you for your question. In terms of the result that can be achieved, there is really no difference between the two approaches. Each has its own pros and cons. The advantages of a periareolar incision is that the scar is very well hidden at the bottom of the areola. The disadvantage for the surgeon is that it is a little more difficult to perform, because the incision is generally smaller. In addition, there is a theoretical disadvantage with periareolar incisions, that there may be an increase in the rate of capsular contracture due to contamination of the implant due to contact with the milk ducts. However, most surgeons now use a Keller Funnel, which is a sort of sterile plastic bag that delivers the implant directly into the pocket without contacting the areolar tissue. This should minimize the increased risk of capsular contracture. I prefer to use a periareolar approach for all my breast augmentations, but I believe patients can get an equally good result using either periareolar of inframammary incisions, regardless of their starting anatomy. I hope this helps.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Periareolar incision vs inframammary incision? Thank you for your question. In terms of the result that can be achieved, there is really no difference between the two approaches. Each has its own pros and cons. The advantages of a periareolar incision is that the scar is very well hidden at the bottom of the areola. The disadvantage for the surgeon is that it is a little more difficult to perform, because the incision is generally smaller. In addition, there is a theoretical disadvantage with periareolar incisions, that there may be an increase in the rate of capsular contracture due to contamination of the implant due to contact with the milk ducts. However, most surgeons now use a Keller Funnel, which is a sort of sterile plastic bag that delivers the implant directly into the pocket without contacting the areolar tissue. This should minimize the increased risk of capsular contracture. I prefer to use a periareolar approach for all my breast augmentations, but I believe patients can get an equally good result using either periareolar of inframammary incisions, regardless of their starting anatomy. I hope this helps.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Peri-areolar incision vs inframammary incision? Yes, I agree with you. I always prefer inframammary incision for a breast implant surgery.You can correct the natural droop in the way you approach the surgery even through an inframammary incision. I do not prefer a peri-areolar incision as it increases the chances of capsular contracture. In peri-areolar incision, you go through the lactiferous ducts. Hence inframammary incision is gold standard in my eyes.
Helpful
Answer: Peri-areolar incision vs inframammary incision? Yes, I agree with you. I always prefer inframammary incision for a breast implant surgery.You can correct the natural droop in the way you approach the surgery even through an inframammary incision. I do not prefer a peri-areolar incision as it increases the chances of capsular contracture. In peri-areolar incision, you go through the lactiferous ducts. Hence inframammary incision is gold standard in my eyes.
Helpful
December 10, 2020
Answer: Incisions Without photos, I cannot be specific. However, the least complications are with the inframammary incision. If your surgeon can do either, then go with the one you want. If you need a lift, the inframammary incision will not be helpful.
Helpful
December 10, 2020
Answer: Incisions Without photos, I cannot be specific. However, the least complications are with the inframammary incision. If your surgeon can do either, then go with the one you want. If you need a lift, the inframammary incision will not be helpful.
Helpful
December 10, 2020
Answer: Periareolar incision vs inframammary incision? As you mentioned the periareolar incision poses a higher risk of capsular contraction than the IMF.Any substantial lift will result in scars. The surgeon you select should be so skilled at breast surgery and lifts that the smallest scar will be utilized to achieve optimal shape. The IMF incision allows the surgeon to avoid milk ducts and loss of sensation.
Helpful
December 10, 2020
Answer: Periareolar incision vs inframammary incision? As you mentioned the periareolar incision poses a higher risk of capsular contraction than the IMF.Any substantial lift will result in scars. The surgeon you select should be so skilled at breast surgery and lifts that the smallest scar will be utilized to achieve optimal shape. The IMF incision allows the surgeon to avoid milk ducts and loss of sensation.
Helpful
December 9, 2020
Answer: Periareolar incision Unfortunately, you have not provided photographs but a periareolar incision can be used to lift your breasts as well as place the implants. This technique excises a donut of skin and the implant can be placed through the non-areola portion of the excision, which is less likely to lead to capsular contracture.
Helpful
December 9, 2020
Answer: Periareolar incision Unfortunately, you have not provided photographs but a periareolar incision can be used to lift your breasts as well as place the implants. This technique excises a donut of skin and the implant can be placed through the non-areola portion of the excision, which is less likely to lead to capsular contracture.
Helpful
