Which would you recommend; Voluma VS Radiesse?

Both Voluma and Radiesse are used extensively in my practice.  They are excellent for volumization of the face, including the midface, cheek, and chin.  I favor Voluma somewhat because it lasts longer and is fully reversible in the rare event that there is a problem.  The downside of Voluma is the cost -- it is more expensive than Radiesee.  For microgenia (small chin), I recommend a chin implant vs fillers because it works better in that area and is permanent.  Best of luck!

Enhancing and shaping the chin with fillers is a minimally invasive office based procedure that can be effective for mild to moderate chin augmentation needs. The options for volumetric fillers in this area are a hyaluronic acid based filler versus a calcium based filler, which could be termed a biostimulator. Both are effective options, though Radiesse may last longer in this region. Voluma is FDA approved for midface enhancement and may last up to 2 years in this region. It could be a viable option which is not as long lasting as Radiesse. Cost may be equivalent. Another option is Sculptra in this region which is a true biostimulator and after 2 vials, a long lasting correction could be achieved. A simple silicone chin implant is a very predictable and reliable option that will last, and from a cost perspective may be equivalent after multiple rounds of fillers.

Both are very good products. Both is used most often for cheek augmentation but can be used at the discretion of an experienced physician injector for chin augmentation. I prefer Voluma as it lasts longer than Radiesse and is reversible in the rare event that the injections created any sort of issue. No filler is ideal for chin augmentation and implants are far superior in projecting and shaping the chin in comparison with injectables. However, fillers are a nice way to "try on" the look of a chin implant but rarely a long term solution.