Should I get saline or silicone?

Thanks for your question
Most patients prefer the silicone, gummy bear implants. They feel soft and natural. Reach out to your surgeon to discuss the best option for you. Best wishes!

Breast implant selection varies based on patients' anatomical structure, aesthetic preferences, and overall health. I find it crucial to conduct a detailed consultation and assessment process for the surgical procedure and the choice of implant type. Saline implants may have limitations in providing a natural look; therefore, I typically recommend Ergonomix type 2 implants. Plans are tailored based on patients' health conditions, and necessary tests are conducted preoperatively. Every surgery carries risks, but I take necessary precautions to minimize them. Saline implants, containing a saline solution, can be easily absorbed in case of leakage but may lack a natural appearance. Silicone implants, especially in Ergonomix type 2, have a low probability of capsule formation. I prefer Ergonomix 2 implants when it comes to natural result.

Silicone implants have a more natural feel with less rippling. Saline is fine and has an advantage in that if it leaks you know for sure and don't have to worry about silent rupture.

Hi from Istanbul! I prefer silicone implants for my patients since they tend to offer a more natural feel and stability. However, it's crucial to opt for high-quality implants and an experienced plastic surgeon to ensure the best results. Best of luck on your journey!

Both saline and silicone implants are made with a silicone shell. The implant shells are then filled with either silicone or saline. Both can achieve natural looking results. The risk of developing an illness after surgery is considered rare. Therefore, you would have to determine which would be more suitable for you.

Dear Laura Scott1309,
the two main types of implants are silicone and saline. The shell of the implants can be either textured (which reduces capsular contracture) or smooth. A textured implant sometimes requires a larger incision. The shape of the implant can be either round or tear drop shaped (gummy bear). Both have their advantages and disadvantages.
The different types of implant offer different pros and cons. For instance, the pros of silicone implants are that they look and feel more natural and ripple less.
On the other hand, the pros of saline implants are that they do not require as large of an incision as silicone, less expensive, they have less incidence of capsular contracture (scarring around the implant), one can tell immediately if there is a rupture, the size can be slightly adjusted, and they can be used for women less than 22 years of age.There have been numerous studies on the safety and efficacy of silicone breast implants. The FDA has approved them to be safe and breast augmentation is the most common cosmetic surgical procedure performed in the United States every year. Implants are much different than they used to be with rigorous testing and cohesive gel. I can't tell you how happy my breast augmentation patients have been with their implants.
I would recommend a consult with a plastic surgeon to go over all of your concerns. Saline implants are also a perfectly good option if you are still concerned and are less expensive.
Daniel Barrett, MDCertified, American Board of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

The positives of saline implants: 1) they cost less than silicone implants, 2) the implants can be filled asymmetrically if you have small volume differences of your breasts, 3) if you develop a leak you will know as the saline is absorb by your body and you will see a gradual deflation.
The negatives of saline implants: 1) there is more folding of the implant shell, which in thin people can result in palpable or visible rippling of the skin of the breast, 2) saline implants don’t feel as natural as silicone implants.
I am not aware that the rate of Breast Implant Related Illness is greater in one implant over the other.
I recommend that you obtain the FDA consent form regarding breast implants, read it in its entirety, and then contact the website of the American Society Of Plastic Surgeons for additional resources on breast implants. These will likely help you answer many of your questions, in addition to a detailed discussion and consultation with your plastic surgeon. Best wishes.

Through outcome surveys and ultrasound evaluation, Swanson, in his 6/2020 PRS publication, objectively found that the visible and palpable rippling rates of silicone gel and saline implants were similar. His study was the first scientific study comparing the two implants. With saline, if it deflates, you know without the need for special x-rays or testing. Usually they require smaller incisions because they are placed empty in the pocket then inflated. They are often about a $1000 dollars less than silicone. These are just a few of the advantages. Dr. Ted Eisenberg, Board Certified Plastic Surgeon and Author. RealSelf Distinguished Hall of Fame Inductee. Philadelphia, Pa., USA

You have to be comfortable with your choice. Both implants can have a natural look, as it depends on the surgeon and how the procedure is addressed as well as implant sizing and the fill. Currently, approximately 85% of the procedure that are done in the country are performed with some type of silicone implant. When I say type, I am referring to the different cohesive or gummy levels of gel that are available on the market. Silicone implants have decreased implant rippling and a more natural (like breast tissue) feel.

Most important factor in your surgery should be the surgeon you choose, rather than the implant. Make certain your surgeon is board certified and has a great deal of experience in breast implant surgery.

Hope that helps.

In the current American prospective study looking at SSBI (no longer referred to as BII as it doesn't fulfill the criteria of a true pathophysiologic illness), the enrollees in the affected group were more likely to have saline implants. More importantly though, there are three findings that stand out. First, although most patients felt improvement or resolution to some or all symptoms, it did not matter if all the scar capsule was removed in one piece, in multiple pieces, or if part of the capsule was left in the patient. This is an indirect indicator that the capsule does not harbor toxic substances. Second, capsule tissue (or breast tissue taken from women in the control group that did not have implants but were getting a breast lift) and blood were analyzed for 20 various heavy metals, silicone, bacteria, and endotoxins produced by bacteria. There was no difference seen between the symptomatic group, the non-symptomatic implant group, or the control group that did not have implants. Finally, the only statistically significant differences between the groups were seen in the intake questionnaires by enrollees. It was found that those with symptoms from their implants were more likely to identify as suffering from anxiety or health anxiety, and that they prefer to get medical information online than from a doctor. As for the implants themselves, silicone gel implants are much more natural than saline. Go get your implants and stop worrying about systemic symptoms.