Hi. What's the best, over or under muscle? I had two consultations with to different doctor that recommended different. One said that I was the perfect patient for over muscle. The other recommend under muscle, to avoid implants to «show» because i have small breasts and normally skinny. 285-300 round implants
Answer: Over or under the muscle Hi thanks for this question. You have had a couple of different opinions because both techniques come with advantages and disadvantages so its a case of weighing up the up- and down-sides of each technique and trying to match this as closely as possible to your breasts, physique, lifestyle and expectations: Under-Breast implant plane ‘Subglandular’ advantages: - most natural place for implant - fills the breast ‘envelope’ evenly disadvantages: - implant is closer to surface - more likely to feel or see shape of implant, or have ripples - may be important for patients who are very thin or who have very small breasts to start with and/or who want a particularly large implant Under-Muscle Implant plane (‘Sub muscular’ or ‘Sub Pectoral’ or ‘Dual Plane’) advantages: - muscle covers the upper part of implant so this makes it less easy to feel / see shape of implant - muscle flattens the upper part of a round implant and this can provide a more ‘natural’ shape (i.e. flat rather than rounded down-slope) - the effects of capsule contracture (tightening around the implant) may be less - although this is controversial and capsule contracture occurs with under muscle implants too disadvantages - breast envelope may not fill as evenly - the implant may sit a bit higher whilst the breast itself slides downwards - may be a problem if the breast already is a bit droopy (‘ptosis’) - the implant may move with the muscle - ‘animation’ of the breast - possibly more discomfort after surgery - the movement and position of the muscles tends to widen the cleavage - implant may still be feelable in the lower part of the breast because the muscle doesn’t cover the bottom part of the implant. overall if you are skinny, i think this is probably the strongest reason to favour under-muscle placement Try to pinch up the skin in the upper part of the breast about half way between nipple and collar bone - if there is less than 2cm, maybe 1.5cm, of pinch width then its a strong recommendation to go under muscle in my opinion. But if you like lots of exercise / workout and especially if you do an upper body / arm sport eg tennis/rowing/climbing it could be a disadvantage to go under the muscle because you will use this muscle a lot so you can anticipate much more movement and compression of implant and may also be prone to some discomfort with your sport although as far as I am aware there is no proof that muscle strength is affected.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Over or under the muscle Hi thanks for this question. You have had a couple of different opinions because both techniques come with advantages and disadvantages so its a case of weighing up the up- and down-sides of each technique and trying to match this as closely as possible to your breasts, physique, lifestyle and expectations: Under-Breast implant plane ‘Subglandular’ advantages: - most natural place for implant - fills the breast ‘envelope’ evenly disadvantages: - implant is closer to surface - more likely to feel or see shape of implant, or have ripples - may be important for patients who are very thin or who have very small breasts to start with and/or who want a particularly large implant Under-Muscle Implant plane (‘Sub muscular’ or ‘Sub Pectoral’ or ‘Dual Plane’) advantages: - muscle covers the upper part of implant so this makes it less easy to feel / see shape of implant - muscle flattens the upper part of a round implant and this can provide a more ‘natural’ shape (i.e. flat rather than rounded down-slope) - the effects of capsule contracture (tightening around the implant) may be less - although this is controversial and capsule contracture occurs with under muscle implants too disadvantages - breast envelope may not fill as evenly - the implant may sit a bit higher whilst the breast itself slides downwards - may be a problem if the breast already is a bit droopy (‘ptosis’) - the implant may move with the muscle - ‘animation’ of the breast - possibly more discomfort after surgery - the movement and position of the muscles tends to widen the cleavage - implant may still be feelable in the lower part of the breast because the muscle doesn’t cover the bottom part of the implant. overall if you are skinny, i think this is probably the strongest reason to favour under-muscle placement Try to pinch up the skin in the upper part of the breast about half way between nipple and collar bone - if there is less than 2cm, maybe 1.5cm, of pinch width then its a strong recommendation to go under muscle in my opinion. But if you like lots of exercise / workout and especially if you do an upper body / arm sport eg tennis/rowing/climbing it could be a disadvantage to go under the muscle because you will use this muscle a lot so you can anticipate much more movement and compression of implant and may also be prone to some discomfort with your sport although as far as I am aware there is no proof that muscle strength is affected.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Over or under muscle? Hi, Choosing between over or under the muscle implant placement is complex. Firstly, it's essential to understand the terminology: "submuscular" means under the muscle; "subglandular" means under the breast tissue, over the muscle and muscle fascia; and "subfascial" means over the muscle but under the pectoralis fascia. A surgeon's experience and your body type heavily influence this decision. Surgeons often prefer the approach they've had the most success with for similar body types. If you have minimal chest tissue, submuscular placement helps avoid an unnatural, abrupt transition between the chest and breast. However, if you have good breast form and desire a small increase in size and projection, subglandular placement might be suitable. The subfascial approach, offering most advantages of submuscular placement without disturbing or injuring the muscle, is gaining popularity. For those who exercise regularly, over the muscle placement is recommended to prevent "animation deformity," where implants move laterally and inferiorly, potentially causing distortion, displacement, or flipping when contracting upper body muscles. Ultimately, discussing your aesthetic goals, anatomy, body type, and lifestyle with your surgeon is crucial for deciding the best implant placement. My comments and recommendations are solely based on your text and are subject to change. I always recommend a face-to-face consultation with a specialist to plan the treatment. Best wishes, Dr. Surmeli.
Helpful
Answer: Over or under muscle? Hi, Choosing between over or under the muscle implant placement is complex. Firstly, it's essential to understand the terminology: "submuscular" means under the muscle; "subglandular" means under the breast tissue, over the muscle and muscle fascia; and "subfascial" means over the muscle but under the pectoralis fascia. A surgeon's experience and your body type heavily influence this decision. Surgeons often prefer the approach they've had the most success with for similar body types. If you have minimal chest tissue, submuscular placement helps avoid an unnatural, abrupt transition between the chest and breast. However, if you have good breast form and desire a small increase in size and projection, subglandular placement might be suitable. The subfascial approach, offering most advantages of submuscular placement without disturbing or injuring the muscle, is gaining popularity. For those who exercise regularly, over the muscle placement is recommended to prevent "animation deformity," where implants move laterally and inferiorly, potentially causing distortion, displacement, or flipping when contracting upper body muscles. Ultimately, discussing your aesthetic goals, anatomy, body type, and lifestyle with your surgeon is crucial for deciding the best implant placement. My comments and recommendations are solely based on your text and are subject to change. I always recommend a face-to-face consultation with a specialist to plan the treatment. Best wishes, Dr. Surmeli.
Helpful
November 15, 2024
Answer: Implant placement Dear Pioneering26540, I almost always place implants submuscular. It lowers the rate of capsular contracture significantly. In addition, it looks much more natural because the muscle provides covering over the implant so its not as round on the top. I've also noticed the implants drop less over time when they are protected under the muscle. Daniel Barrett, MDCertified, American Board of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Helpful
November 15, 2024
Answer: Implant placement Dear Pioneering26540, I almost always place implants submuscular. It lowers the rate of capsular contracture significantly. In addition, it looks much more natural because the muscle provides covering over the implant so its not as round on the top. I've also noticed the implants drop less over time when they are protected under the muscle. Daniel Barrett, MDCertified, American Board of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Helpful
October 29, 2024
Answer: Over vs Under the muscle Thank you for your question! Over the muscle placement (subglandular) can create a fuller, rounder look without extra muscle involvement, which can sometimes be ideal for patients looking for a strong, noticeable upper pole fullness. For naturally smaller and leaner patients, there’s a higher chance that the implants may be more visible or feel less natural, especially in the upper part of the breast, which is why visibility can sometimes be a concern for patients with less breast tissue. However, under the muscle placement (submuscular) can provide a more natural look, especially for patients with small breasts and a lean build, as the muscle helps to camouflage the implant. In your case, the choice depends on your priority for either a fuller look with quicker recovery (over the muscle) or a more natural look with minimized implant visibility (under the muscle). Both options can be tailored to give great results, but based on your thin frame and small natural breast size, the recommendation for under the muscle might indeed help achieve a softer, more natural result.
Helpful
October 29, 2024
Answer: Over vs Under the muscle Thank you for your question! Over the muscle placement (subglandular) can create a fuller, rounder look without extra muscle involvement, which can sometimes be ideal for patients looking for a strong, noticeable upper pole fullness. For naturally smaller and leaner patients, there’s a higher chance that the implants may be more visible or feel less natural, especially in the upper part of the breast, which is why visibility can sometimes be a concern for patients with less breast tissue. However, under the muscle placement (submuscular) can provide a more natural look, especially for patients with small breasts and a lean build, as the muscle helps to camouflage the implant. In your case, the choice depends on your priority for either a fuller look with quicker recovery (over the muscle) or a more natural look with minimized implant visibility (under the muscle). Both options can be tailored to give great results, but based on your thin frame and small natural breast size, the recommendation for under the muscle might indeed help achieve a softer, more natural result.
Helpful
October 16, 2024
Answer: Breast augmentation Hi... the positioning of the implants depends on patients anatomy and breast tissue.... as you mentioned that you are skinny and have small breasts , in my opinion may be the best result can be achieved by placing the implants under the muscle, dual plane...so the result will be more natural
Helpful
October 16, 2024
Answer: Breast augmentation Hi... the positioning of the implants depends on patients anatomy and breast tissue.... as you mentioned that you are skinny and have small breasts , in my opinion may be the best result can be achieved by placing the implants under the muscle, dual plane...so the result will be more natural
Helpful
October 8, 2024
Answer: Over or under? I generally prefer to put the implant under the muscle for several reasons. Probably the most important consideration is how much tissue you have in the upper pole of your breast to hide and soften the implant appearance. If you pinch this area and have about 2 cm of tissue above the muscle, placing the implant over the muscle probably will not lead to issues of implant visibility. But then if a patient loses weight… Visibility may occur.
Helpful
October 8, 2024
Answer: Over or under? I generally prefer to put the implant under the muscle for several reasons. Probably the most important consideration is how much tissue you have in the upper pole of your breast to hide and soften the implant appearance. If you pinch this area and have about 2 cm of tissue above the muscle, placing the implant over the muscle probably will not lead to issues of implant visibility. But then if a patient loses weight… Visibility may occur.
Helpful