I am curious why so few providers offer the Ellman radio frequency mole removal. It appears to be less invasive, with faster recovery and less chance of scarring in many instances for many different types of lesions. If removed by a scalpel first, the mole can be biopsied as well. It also appears to be far more common in Europe. It appears like a great option for raised moles. Why do plastic surgeons and dermatologists choose excision/shave method instead? Is there a safety issue?
Answers (2)
From board-certified doctors and trusted medical professionals
I suggest you see an expert this would need pretreatment with cosmelan 2, vivatia, vitamin c, and phyto plus, reve skin retinol and anteageMD (see link to emeragecosmetics.com for skincare) to prevent hyperpigmentation. Then treatment in the office. Best, Dr. Emer.
Mole removal begins with a comprehensive examination and consultation to determine the likelihood of a mole being worrisome. Excisional and incisional biopsies are reserved for suspicious moles. But it’s good news that most moles are not problematic and are only cosmetic, thus leading to the o...
