Great question! Your demonstrates that you understand the core challenge surgeons face in performing gluteal fat transfer.Fat embolus is a very serious and known complication of fat transfer (which has been recently spotlighted in the media). While it is true, injection of donor fat into the infra-muscular plane (within the muscle) increases fat viability, this does come with a significant increase in risk. There are large vessels deep to and within the muscle which can be inadvertently injected while grafting leading to a fat embolus. The consequences of such a complication are very serious and life threatening. BBL/gluteal lipoaugmentation demonstrates a dramatically higher risk profile than other surgeries. The Aesthetic Surgery and Educational and Research Fund has convened a task force as well. The hope is that we will have more concrete guidelines for addressing these very serious complications. That being said, the safest way to avoid fat emboli is to stay in the subcutaneous plane (at the expense of fat viability) and avoid the deeper muscular plane. If grafting of the deep plane is planned, surgeons should consider blunt cannulas and aspiration prior to injection. Using a supra-gluteal approach to minimize the risk of inadvertent intravascular injection has also been proposed. While this will likely impact graft viability negatively, it will also lower the risk of a serious complication. According to AAASF data the risk of death from BBL will range from 1:3000 (subcutaneous grafting should reduce this risk relative to intramuscular grafting). By comparison the risk of fatal complication from abdominoplasty is 1:13,000. Relatively speaking, the subcutaneous plane is the "safe" plane. It is unclear how the relative risk falls with subcutaneous injection vs. intramuscular injection (however, in all likelihood, it is less).With regards to your specific question, some surgeons do use ultrasound to identify and avoid vessels at risk for inadvertent cannulation and injection. This can also help prevent injury to the vessel which has also been proposed as a passive mechanism for emboli (i.e. if the vessel is injured...there is a low pressure system within which contrasts with the high pressure environment of a gluteus filled in some cases to capacity).Ultimately, this may become a universally accepted protocol. However, cost and logistics are probably a limiting factor for employing US routinely in these cases.As always, discuss your concerns with a board certified plastic surgeon (ABPS).