You can’t really change your own anatomy. It is important to recognize your own candidacy for the procedure. It’s a little hard to tell for sure from the pictures but perhaps you have a mild pectus excavatum. Each plastic surgeon will have their own level of comfort on how close to the midline they open the pocket for breast implants. You never want to go all the way, or the complication known as symmastia may occur There are three variables that determine the outcome of breast augmentation surgery. The first is the patient candidacy. This includes variables like breast, asymmetry, breast position on the chest wall, breast ptosis and breast divergence. The second variable list of choice of implants in regards to size, shape, and type. The third variable is the surgeons ability to place the implant in the correct anatomic position. I generally recommend patients have multiple in person consultations before selecting a provider and scheduling surgery. During each consultation, ask each provider to open up their portfolio and show you their entire collection of before, and after pictures of previous patients, who had similar body characteristics to your own. It is important to understand your own candidacy for the procedure. Variables that alter candidacy need to be understood because they will impact the outcome. Patients can have surgical perfect outcomes and be unhappy with breast augmentation because they didn’t understand That their own candidacy was a little less than ideal for the procedure. This happens quite frequently. It’s common with patients who have breast divergence. Divergence tends to be amplified with the projection of implants. Implant selection is also very important. Patients who select excessively large implants are going to have increased undesirable, side effects, increased, complication rates, and increased the rate of revision surgery. An experience provider should have no difficulty showing you the before, and after pictures of at least 50 previous patients. Being shown only a handful of pre-selected images, representing only the best results of a providers career or of patients who don’t look similar to what you do may be insufficient to get a clear understanding of what aver results look like in the hands of each provider, what your results are likely to look like or how many of these procedures they have actually done. Ask each provider what their most common indication for doing revision surgery is, what their revision rate is, and what their revision policy is. All plastics surgeons do revisions. Claiming to have a close to zero revision rate is not at all ideal. It means that somebody is not offering the best outcomes for their patients. The one complication I would be most concerned about is providers who end up having implants that bottom out on a regular basis. This undesirable outcome is highly dependent on how the procedure is performed and tends to be complex, and sometimes difficult to treat during revision surgery. Implants bottoming out is also related to using excessively large implants. Best, Mats Hagstrom, MD