I took at an article for your review Breast Implant Rupture: Causes, Incidence, Clinical Impact, and Management Handel, Neal M.D.; Garcia, M. Emily Ph.D.; Wixtrom, Roger Ph.D. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery: November 2013 - Volume 132 - Issue 5 - p 1128–1137doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c243Cosmetic: Original Articles This is the section of the article Potential Health Implications of Rupture As noted above, ruptured silicone implants may or may not be associated with local symptoms, such as palpable masses within the breast, axilla, or adjacent areas (e.g., subcutaneous tissues of the chest and abdomen). Sometimes, patients experience a change in breast shape or volume. Ruptured silicone implants may also be associated with pain, tingling, swelling, numbness, burning, or hardening of the breast.30 A recent animal study by Moyer and colleagues suggests that rupture may also contribute to greater capsule firmness and potentially capsular contracture.37 The overall body of evidence does not support a link between rupture and connective tissue disease or cancer.38 There was a recent report in France of a woman with ruptured Poly Implant Prothèse implants who developed anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. However, there is no evidence to suggest any direct link between rupture of silicone-gel implants and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, as anaplastic large-cell lymphoma has also been reported in patients with saline-filled implants.39 also the article further states..... When it comes to making recommendations for asymptomatic patients with suspected implant rupture, several factors should be considered. Some of these factors are implant-dependent, whereas others are patient-dependent. It is widely recognized that simple exposure to silicone outside the elastomer shell does not increase the risk of immunologic disorders,41–44 breast cancer,45 or other tumors.46 Therefore, the issue is whether silicone is likely to spread beyond the confines of the periprosthetic capsule and cause local, regional, or distant “symptoms” that are troublesome to the patient. This is dependent in large measure on the physical characteristics of the silicone gel used in any given device. There have been literally hundreds of different types and styles of silicone implants introduced over the past 50 years. In recent generation devices, the gel is more highly cross-linked, more cohesive, and may be less likely to disseminate beyond the confines of the capsule compared with older generation devices. Another article: Five-Year Safety Data for More than 55,000 Subjects following Breast Implantation: Comparison of Rare Adverse Event Rates with Silicone Implants versus National Norms and Saline Implants Singh, Navin M.D., M.B.A.; Picha, George J. M.D., Ph.D.; Hardas, Bhushan M.D., M.B.A.; Schumacher, Andrew Ph.D.; Murphy, Diane K. M.B.A. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery: October 2017 - Volume 140 - Issue 4 - p 666–679doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003711Breast: Original Articles Conclusions: Results from 5 to 8 years of follow-up for a large number of subjects confirmed the safety of Natrelle round silicone implants, with no increased risk of systemic disease or suicide versus national norms or saline implants. SO THE DATA CONTINUES TO SUPPORT THE SAFETY OF BREAST IMPLANTS. I HOPE THIS HELPS. Dr. Dillon