60% of people who get butt implant surgery end up with their bodies rejecting it. Is this true?

Question

a fair percentage of peoples bodies reject to butt implants wow is this really true? and if done correctly will they have a natural look>?

Ryan A. Stanton, MD · Answer

In experienced hands of a buttock implant specialist, that could not be further from the truth. After doing buttock implants for 14 years, my personal complication rates is very similar to those of breast augmention with implants. Please read on for more general information:Allow me to share with you some information that you may not hear elsewhere. There are only two proven safe and relatively effective methods for Buttock Augmentation and Hip Augmentation: 1) Autologous Fat Transfer (using your own fat, transferring from one area of the body to the other) and 2) Buttock/Hip Implants (semi-solid silicone rubber implants that cannot rupture &/or leak). Both are very good options so what it comes down to, like any surgery, is proper patient selection.Indeed because at least 50+ % of the fat transferred will melt away within a year, most patients are not good candidates because they lack an adequate amount of fat to harvest. Another tip is that if you purposely gain weight (i.e. fat) for the procedure, the fat you lose first as you get back to your baseline weight is that very same fat that was transferred into your buttock...so don't fall victim to this recommendation.  Although using your own fat is relatively safe, the one serious complication that can rarely (< 1%) happen is "fat embolism" in which some of the fat gets into the blood stream and travels up into the lungs, heart, and/or brain causing serious problems. This complication is more likely to happen with the larger amount of fat being transferred. This is even more likely to happen when using fillers like PMMA and hyaluronic acids. Also fillers, when injected in large quantities, have a relatively high tendency to migrate away from the original area they were placed and tend to stimulate a lot of inflammation and a subsequent disastrous amount of scar tissue/hardening.Thus buttock/hip implants become a very good, safe, and long term reliable option for most patients seeking buttock augmentation (at least in my practice). I prefer to insert the buttock implants through a 2 inch long incision over the tailbone (concealed within the crevice between the buttock cheeks) and the hip implants through a ~ 1 inch incision just below the beltline above the hip region. The buttock implant should always be placed under or within the gluteus maximus muscle. In this position, the implant is less palpable, less visible, and does not sag or shift/migrate over time unlike implants placed on top of the muscle. Therefore it is extremely important to seek consultation with a board certified plastic surgeon who specializes in this procedure (in fact both implants and fat transfer so that s/he is not bias). And in this case too, at least in my surgical practice, the infection rate is minimized to ~5%. Glad to help.Depending upon the amount of your current fat reserves and their distribution, you may or may not be a reasonable candidate for fat transfer.  If you are wanting to utilize the fat to further augment your buttock in addition to implants, then I caution you against this.  The reason being that the fat needs to be placed into the buttock muscles for optimal survival, however, this is exactly where the implant needs to reside and thus risks infection and/or death of the fat.  Because of this risk, I frequently avoid fat grafting into a buttock that has an implant.  Bottom line, I recommend consulting with a board certified plastic surgeon specialist in buttock augmentation (BOTH implants and fat transfer) to determine what option is best for you.  Glad to help.

Kenneth Hughes, MD · Answer

I think that this is probably a percentage that is too high.  I think that it is probably more like 5 to 10%.Kenneth Hughes, MDLos Angeles, CA

Barry L. Eppley, MD, DMD · Answer

This is a completely untrue statement about buttock implants by both the percent of removal and the reasons for it. Buttock implants probably have only a slighter higher rate of complications than breast implants which surprisingly number in the 10% to 20% range in the first few years after implantation looking at the manufacturer's statistics. They are prone to the same type of potential complications from infection, seroma, malposition and other aesthetic issues. Implants may be come infected which may necessitate their removal, not rejection as the silicone material is very biocompatible. (and not prone to rupture like breast implants) Seroma is the number one complication in buttock implants particularly in the subfascial pocket location.

Luis E. Redondo, MD · Answer

If that was true, they wouldn't be approved by any institution in the world. As for the look, if done in the right plane by someone with experience, no one should never know you have implants.Regards,Dr. Luis Redondo

60% of people who get butt implant surgery end up with their bodies rejecting it. Is this true?

Answers (4)

Answer: 60 % rejection rate

Answer: 60 % rejection rate

Recommended reading

Everything you need to know about Butt Implants

Our mission is to create a world where every investment in modern beauty is Worth It.

60% of people who get butt implant surgery end up with their bodies rejecting it. Is this true?

Answers (4)

Answer: 60 % rejection rate

Answer: 60 % rejection rate

Browse related questions

Recommended reading

Everything you need to know about Butt Implants

Our mission is to create a world where every investment in modern beauty is Worth It.