Your is a collection of reasons how not to make a breast augmentation. Here your problems and their technical correction:-your incision is not orthodox, it is not at the central sumammary fold, is somehow lateral, that is not correct, that is an exposed area of the side of the boob and the right location is straightly downwards the nipple below at the sumammary fold, there is no justification for this and, sadly, it has no correction, once the implants are changed for some of correct dimensions (yours are too wide, obviously) the new sumammary fold will be quite likely above this scar making the scar be on the chest and not on the breast-your implants, as forementioned, are too wide for your mammary base framework, you need narrower and shorter ones; because of this excess of width you have the bulge at the sides and at the bottom (too long distance nipple-submammary fold); therefore you need narrower implants but... -narrower implants when a too wide ones have previously inserted are a challenge; if you have implants wrongly chosen and too wide for your theoretcial mammary base, then you need to go for implants that are narrower to an exact fit into your ribcage, but this does not necessarily mean downsizing them, or changing the profile, the profile or projection can be the same, but with narrower base. If the reduction in base is slight or moderate no additional gesture is needed, but if the difference from previous base to current widht is significative like will be in your case then a lateral (to close the armpit pocket) and lower (to reduce the nipple-submammary fold distance) capsulorraphy in multipoint modality are bound, and yes... this is the MOST difficult maneouver in revision surgery of the breast, I tell you in my experience it catches more attention from my brain than any other procedures, but I can also tell you the results are awesome.-you also have a dynamic double bubble deformity that worsens into a grotesque shape when you contract your pectoralis muscle, this is because the surgeon used the partial submuscular location aka dual plane (a very good and brilliant option, no criticism about it) but he did NOT release the muscle from the cutaneous adherences, so this creates this double fold effect aggravated with contractionNeedless to say you need a very very good surgeon with very good skills and vast experience in revision cases and capsulorraphies. I recommend subascial plane and latest generation anatomical shaped, cohesive gel filled macrotextured implants (polyurethane if available, since they make biovelcro). What an amazing case for the right surgeon, a hell for many, beware who you choose, things may worsen if the technique is botched again.