I had Sientra 350cc mod profile placed 12 months ago. They were placed over the muscle (subfascial). I am thin and I was an A cup prior. My surgeon prefers subfascial. When I asked them about a revision for the rippling, they are recommending that I stay subfascial and choose a more cohesive implant. With my rippling, would this be enough or should I request an under the muscle approach? Any brand recommendations to reduce rippling? Thank you!!
Answer: Rippling Dear Mercury122, breast revision surgery is the most difficult plastic surgery procedure performed. Botched breast surgery alters normal tissue planes and laxity, the ability of breasts to heal properly, and leaves scar tissue that dramatically affects the level of difficulty of the corrective surgery. Many patients come in to correct poor outcomes from their initial surgeries. The most common problems are due to implant malposition, bottoming out of the implant, poor scarring, and incorrect implant size. While the type of revision required will depend on the result of the previous surgery and the desired result of the patient, some revisions involve extensive pocket repair that may or may not need specialized external bras. If you are considering breast surgery revision, you should speak with a board certified plastic surgeon and have yourself properly assessed. Only after a thorough examination you will get more information and recommendations. Also, you have to make sure that your surgeon understands your breast augmentation goals. Daniel Barrett, MD Certified, American Board of Plastic Surgery Member, American Society of Plastic Surgery Member, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Rippling Dear Mercury122, breast revision surgery is the most difficult plastic surgery procedure performed. Botched breast surgery alters normal tissue planes and laxity, the ability of breasts to heal properly, and leaves scar tissue that dramatically affects the level of difficulty of the corrective surgery. Many patients come in to correct poor outcomes from their initial surgeries. The most common problems are due to implant malposition, bottoming out of the implant, poor scarring, and incorrect implant size. While the type of revision required will depend on the result of the previous surgery and the desired result of the patient, some revisions involve extensive pocket repair that may or may not need specialized external bras. If you are considering breast surgery revision, you should speak with a board certified plastic surgeon and have yourself properly assessed. Only after a thorough examination you will get more information and recommendations. Also, you have to make sure that your surgeon understands your breast augmentation goals. Daniel Barrett, MD Certified, American Board of Plastic Surgery Member, American Society of Plastic Surgery Member, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 16, 2025
Answer: Ripples Stay with gel implants, go smaller, and place them behind the muscle for best coverage. The fascia is not coverage enough, or consider adding mesh. If you have donor fat, consider a fat transfer as well.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 16, 2025
Answer: Ripples Stay with gel implants, go smaller, and place them behind the muscle for best coverage. The fascia is not coverage enough, or consider adding mesh. If you have donor fat, consider a fat transfer as well.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 16, 2025
Answer: Pocket exchange An exchange of the implant pocket to submuscular should correct this. Also the use a more cohesive implants, acellular dermal matrix, and fat grafting can correct this.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 16, 2025
Answer: Pocket exchange An exchange of the implant pocket to submuscular should correct this. Also the use a more cohesive implants, acellular dermal matrix, and fat grafting can correct this.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 16, 2025
Answer: Implant visibility Hello and thank you for your question. Visible implant rippling occurs because of a combination of two factors: thin soft tissue coverage and the cohesivity ( gel thickness) of the implant utilized. Accordingly, it can be treated by either increasing the soft tissue coverage or the cohesivity of the implant, or a combination of both. If your surgeon used a style 106 implant, a more cohesive choice would be the 107 HSC+ implant. Alternatively, other manufacturers also have highly cohesive gel implants. The quality of soft tissue coverage can be increased by either placing the implant below the muscle or by adding fat grafting to your procedure. In my opinion, the most effective means of reducing the likelihood of rippling is to place a highly cohesive gel implant below the muscle. I hope this helps. Good luck.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 16, 2025
Answer: Implant visibility Hello and thank you for your question. Visible implant rippling occurs because of a combination of two factors: thin soft tissue coverage and the cohesivity ( gel thickness) of the implant utilized. Accordingly, it can be treated by either increasing the soft tissue coverage or the cohesivity of the implant, or a combination of both. If your surgeon used a style 106 implant, a more cohesive choice would be the 107 HSC+ implant. Alternatively, other manufacturers also have highly cohesive gel implants. The quality of soft tissue coverage can be increased by either placing the implant below the muscle or by adding fat grafting to your procedure. In my opinion, the most effective means of reducing the likelihood of rippling is to place a highly cohesive gel implant below the muscle. I hope this helps. Good luck.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 16, 2025
Answer: Rippling I would recommend switching the implant into a submuscular dual plane pocket. This will provide better soft tissue coverage of the implant. I would also recommend switching to a more cohesive silicone gel implant. Higher cohesivity more filled silicone gel implants ripple way less. Another option would be to fat graft the areas but this is not necessarily addressing the problem which is implant rippling that is visible through a very thin soft tissue covering. The fat grafting is also more unpredictable given 40-60% of fat graft survival.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 16, 2025
Answer: Rippling I would recommend switching the implant into a submuscular dual plane pocket. This will provide better soft tissue coverage of the implant. I would also recommend switching to a more cohesive silicone gel implant. Higher cohesivity more filled silicone gel implants ripple way less. Another option would be to fat graft the areas but this is not necessarily addressing the problem which is implant rippling that is visible through a very thin soft tissue covering. The fat grafting is also more unpredictable given 40-60% of fat graft survival.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful