I had a vaginal rejuvenation one year ago including tightening of the full canal, hood reduction, labiaplasty (trim of minora), and perineoplasty. I am a mother of 5 having 3 vaginal births and a twin c-section. I did not get the results I anticipated. My minora are still bulky and uncomfortable and the canal is not much tighter than before. My results have caused me a bit of anxiety and I just wonder how common is it for this surgery to fail. Is a further reduction more risky than original op?
Answer: Results Based on your submitted photos it appears you are a candidate for a revision to your procedures. It is important to discuss with your surgeon what you are wanting in terms of results. It's equally important to understand from your surgeon what you can realistically expect. I encourage you to discuss your concerns with your surgeon. Hopefully the situation can be rectified if the issue was a lack of communication.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Results Based on your submitted photos it appears you are a candidate for a revision to your procedures. It is important to discuss with your surgeon what you are wanting in terms of results. It's equally important to understand from your surgeon what you can realistically expect. I encourage you to discuss your concerns with your surgeon. Hopefully the situation can be rectified if the issue was a lack of communication.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
May 30, 2023
Answer: A revision surgery carries similar risks as the original Hello MissyMe2, You are a candidate for a revision surgery to further reduce your labia and clitoral hood. You need a clitoral hood lifting as well since it is drooping. If you are still feeling as loose as beofre perhaps you have vaginal prolpase that wasn't addressed at the time of your vaginoplasty. Go to the link below to see hundreds of before and after photos where you will find many examples that are similar to you. From that link you can schedule a virtual consultation via phone or zoom, at which time we can discuss in depth your anatomy, expectations and concerns. Women from all over the world travel to my Center for their reconstructive and cosmetic vaginal surgery. Best of luck,
Helpful
May 30, 2023
Answer: A revision surgery carries similar risks as the original Hello MissyMe2, You are a candidate for a revision surgery to further reduce your labia and clitoral hood. You need a clitoral hood lifting as well since it is drooping. If you are still feeling as loose as beofre perhaps you have vaginal prolpase that wasn't addressed at the time of your vaginoplasty. Go to the link below to see hundreds of before and after photos where you will find many examples that are similar to you. From that link you can schedule a virtual consultation via phone or zoom, at which time we can discuss in depth your anatomy, expectations and concerns. Women from all over the world travel to my Center for their reconstructive and cosmetic vaginal surgery. Best of luck,
Helpful
July 25, 2023
Answer: How common is it for this surgery to fail? Is a further reduction more risky than original op? Hi MissyMe2. This surgery did not necessarily fail. Did you and your surgeon discuss how much labia to remove? Did he draw a picture on your own pre-op pictures to review what he recommends to remove? Did you discuss excising the sub-frenulum folds? - The folds directly under the clitoral hood that merge with your labia? The good thing about this operative result is that you have labial tissue remaining that can be reshaped and sculpted to what you might be happier with. Many patients that have botched labiaplasties do not have enough tissue remaining to revise the surgery. The risk of the surgery should be no different than the original risk assuming you don't have any new medical issues or problems.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
July 25, 2023
Answer: How common is it for this surgery to fail? Is a further reduction more risky than original op? Hi MissyMe2. This surgery did not necessarily fail. Did you and your surgeon discuss how much labia to remove? Did he draw a picture on your own pre-op pictures to review what he recommends to remove? Did you discuss excising the sub-frenulum folds? - The folds directly under the clitoral hood that merge with your labia? The good thing about this operative result is that you have labial tissue remaining that can be reshaped and sculpted to what you might be happier with. Many patients that have botched labiaplasties do not have enough tissue remaining to revise the surgery. The risk of the surgery should be no different than the original risk assuming you don't have any new medical issues or problems.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
June 6, 2023
Answer: Labiaplasty revision and vaginoplasty revision After seeing the pictures. You should have your labiaplasty revised to achieve your desired results. You can achieve satisfactory results by reducing the labia minora in addition to some clitoral hood reduction. Make sure to consult a skilled urogynocologist or cosmetic gynecologist for an assessment and advice of the operations required in the vaginal canal.
Helpful
June 6, 2023
Answer: Labiaplasty revision and vaginoplasty revision After seeing the pictures. You should have your labiaplasty revised to achieve your desired results. You can achieve satisfactory results by reducing the labia minora in addition to some clitoral hood reduction. Make sure to consult a skilled urogynocologist or cosmetic gynecologist for an assessment and advice of the operations required in the vaginal canal.
Helpful
May 30, 2023
Answer: Labiaplasty revision As the inventor and innovator of the wedge technique in 1994, I reconstruct many women who have had labia reductions by other surgeons, both wedge and trimming techniques. You had a trimming labiaplasty which resulted in continued fullness, excess clitoral hood, and scalloping. The reconstruction is much more difficult than a primary labiaplasty and should be done by a plastic surgeon with extensive experience in labia reconstruction. I published the first and most extensive paper on labia reconstruction in the prestigious journal "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery" about ten years ago. You can have a much better appearance by a very skilled reconstructive labiaplasty surgery. Approximately 40% of the surgeries I perform are revisions of other surgeons' labiaplasties. I would do a central wedge excision on each side to reduce your labia and eliminate most of your scallops. Another trim may leave you with further scallops and the length of your labia may still be redundant. It can be done very safely as I have invented this procedure and have done it thousands of times. Your clitoral hood is thick, wide, and protuberant. It can be decreased somewhat by reducing the sides. I invented a clitoropexy with clitoral hood reduction in which the clitoris is pushed closer to the pubic bone and the width, thickness, length, and protuberance of the clitoral hood can be drastically decreased. I have done it over 400 times with excellent results. I have not published this technique, so no one does it like me. Your vaginal canal can be furthered tightened at the same time. No matter the technique, an inexperienced or unskilled surgeon can lead to a high rate of complications, chronic scar discomfort, labial deformities, and further surgery. About 40% of my labia cases are reconstructions of other surgeons' labiaplasties. You only get one good chance to reconstruct you, so be patient and ask a lot of questions. Gary J. Alter, M.D. Beverly Hills, CA - Manhattan, NY
Helpful
May 30, 2023
Answer: Labiaplasty revision As the inventor and innovator of the wedge technique in 1994, I reconstruct many women who have had labia reductions by other surgeons, both wedge and trimming techniques. You had a trimming labiaplasty which resulted in continued fullness, excess clitoral hood, and scalloping. The reconstruction is much more difficult than a primary labiaplasty and should be done by a plastic surgeon with extensive experience in labia reconstruction. I published the first and most extensive paper on labia reconstruction in the prestigious journal "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery" about ten years ago. You can have a much better appearance by a very skilled reconstructive labiaplasty surgery. Approximately 40% of the surgeries I perform are revisions of other surgeons' labiaplasties. I would do a central wedge excision on each side to reduce your labia and eliminate most of your scallops. Another trim may leave you with further scallops and the length of your labia may still be redundant. It can be done very safely as I have invented this procedure and have done it thousands of times. Your clitoral hood is thick, wide, and protuberant. It can be decreased somewhat by reducing the sides. I invented a clitoropexy with clitoral hood reduction in which the clitoris is pushed closer to the pubic bone and the width, thickness, length, and protuberance of the clitoral hood can be drastically decreased. I have done it over 400 times with excellent results. I have not published this technique, so no one does it like me. Your vaginal canal can be furthered tightened at the same time. No matter the technique, an inexperienced or unskilled surgeon can lead to a high rate of complications, chronic scar discomfort, labial deformities, and further surgery. About 40% of my labia cases are reconstructions of other surgeons' labiaplasties. You only get one good chance to reconstruct you, so be patient and ask a lot of questions. Gary J. Alter, M.D. Beverly Hills, CA - Manhattan, NY
Helpful