Can this extra piece of skin on clitoris even after 2nd procedure be fixed?

Thank you for your questionAbsolutely. The skin you are looking at is called prepuce. This should have been addressed with the first labia reduction procedure . Ideally you should have a bridge of the nose appearance. it should be easy for any experienced cosmetic gynecologist to perform. You can see several example on the before and after photos on RealSelf

Hello, I think it's not too bad. I understand that the fold on the left side of the clitoris bothers you. This fold can be corrected with a small operation. If you do not feel well, a minor clitoral hood revision can be done.

Hi there,

I see a very small piece of tissue on the left side of the clitoral hood. I am not sure that this is what you are talking about, but if it is, this small bit of skin can be excised or removed.
To be honest, this small piece would never be noticed by your sexual partner and you should ask yourself if there is something else in your life that us holding you back from an enjoyable sexual relationship.

Wishing you the best,

Dr. Christine Roders

Thank you for sharing your question and photographs. This redundant tissue is referred to as lateral prepuce and can be addressed with a small, in-office procedure. Hope this helps.

The extra skin can be reduced effectively with a sculpted mini surgical reduction. Local anesthesia would be sufficient. This is a routine part of contouring in my practice and does not involve areas of critical nerves. Nonetheless, it is best handled by an expert who does these routinely. A virtual consult would be your next step.

The extra fold along your clitoral hood extending to your labium can be removed. As the inventor of the central wedge labiaplasty in 1995, I have seen every variation. It needs to be surgically excised, but the attachment to the left labium may need to be reconstructed, which requires some expertise, possibly a small wedge to give a natural attachment and left labium.

Gary J. Alter, M.D.

Beverly Hills, CA- Manhattan, NY

Hello Lipsylabiagirl,
What you refer to as "extra tissue on your clit" is redundant lateral prepuce on the left side. This can be reduced under local anesthesia in an office setting. You are sooo close to having that look you are seeking.
Go to the link below to see hundreds of B/A photos with patients whove had their redundatn lateral prepuce reduced at the time of their labiaplasty. You will likely find some examples that are quite similar to you. From that link you may schedule a virtual consult via phone or zoom, at which time we can discuss in-depth your anatomy, expectations, and concerns. Women from all over the world travel to my Center for their Intimate Makeover under local anesthesia.
Best of luck,

Hi there, there is a small amount of extra skin there that can easily be removed. This would be a simple revision procedure and if it is causing you that much concern then it may be the right option for you. I would like to say that I would not highly recommend another surgery, but if it's enough of a concern it is certainly a treatable issue. All the best, Dr. Susan Mikaelian.

This can absolutely be fixed by any experienced cosmeto-gynecology surgeon. It looks lilke you just need a little additional clitoral hood retraction. Wait untill at least six months after your most recent revision to fully assess your results.

Q: Is an additional surgery needed to eradicate two botched prior surgeries?
A: Yes, you will need the third surgery to satisfy your genital perception look to feel comfortable with your intimate life. However, you need to understand your esthetic problem after your two surgeries. All attached pictures clearly show your problem with botched surgery, Advisors here just seeing the extra clitoral hood tissues to remove will resolve your all esthetic concerns.
Your esthetic problems to satisfy your expectation can be summarized:
1. The left thin labial tissues were unnaturally brought up to the pubic bone (the commissure anterior) with the documented problem of surgical suturing technique (it is considered as “railroad track” complications), figure 3. You correctly noticed in your presentation, quote: “…still this extra tissue on my clit that looks like a 3rd labia lip almost.” This situation will require corrective surgery on the left labial tissue and not just to remove extra clitoral hood tissues,
2. On the left, the clitoral hood orifice tissues were brought down to the thin labia bifurcation and will need reconstruction,
3. The straight thin labial look after two surgeries is departure from the natural appearance of these structures. The surgeon selected the wrong surgical technique, which changed the naturally rounded shape to an unnatural straight look with the left thin labia asymmetrical and wave appearance. Furthermore, separation of the labial frenulum (left and right thin labial connection at the lowest part) need also be rebuild. To reconstruct it will require tow stages of surgery a) expend both thin labia tissues (the method that I developed; however, not yet published); b) recreate the symmetrical, rounded and without waves appearance of the thin labia.
It is challenging to understand why Dr. Marco Pelosi III presented his surgical concepts, that are not related to the question here and not necessarily right one, Perineoplasty (the crotch surgery) or the hair labial surgery (the labia majora), or other unrelated surgeries to the question were presented. Anatomical presentation in his segment is also adequate. This woman who asked the question how and what what corrective surgery can cure her emotional disturbance due to unsatisfactory surgical outcomes that still created an unacceptable look followed two cosmetic surgeries on her external genitalia. This woman needs an honest clinical answer supported by clinical-scientific data and not what is the marketing intentions of advisors since she is facing the 3rd surgery for the same esthetic problems. At this moment, misleading or marketing information is the last thing that she needs. It is an advisor’s responsibility to provide adequate scientific-clinical information in addition to marketing. It is a simple reason that I do not market my practice on the RealSelf website, although I do not have any objection to those who do.
With regards,Prof. Dr. Adam OstrzenskiUSA