An extended tummy tuck can go by different names or terminology. That wraps around to the backside is generally considered an extended tummy tuck, and if the skin excision goes all the way around the procedure is either called a circumferential tummy tuck or lower body lift. The extent of skin excision should be based on the extent of skin laxity. Individuals who have skin laxity that continues towards the backside generally benefit by having a more extensive skin excision, leaving them with a longer scar but improved contour that continues not only on the front, but also on the sides and back. Generally speaking plastic surgeons will err on the side of under resection rather than over resection. A failure of extending the procedure to incorporate skin laxity on the sides or backside leaves an insufficient skin excision with imperfect body contour with the development of skin folds called dog ears. Extending a tummy tuck is a fairly major deviation to the primary procedures. Doing so requires repositioning the patient during general anesthesia. This may seem trivial, but is in fact complex, and can take a significant amount of time and effort. Moving a patient during general anesthesia typically takes six people and can take 30 or more minutes. My personal recommendation is to go with the provider who recommends the more extensive procedure. Patient should always be careful in choosing providers based on having in person consultations during which time I encourage patient to ask providers to open up your portfolio and show you their entire collection of previous patients who had similar body characteristics and had the recommended procedure. An experienced plastic surgeon should have no difficulty showing you the before and after pictures of at least 50 previous patients. Extended tummy tucks are not nearly as common as standard tummy tucks, but a sufficiently experienced Plastic surgeon should have ample documentation of previously done cases of patients who have similar body characteristics. In regards to your assessment regarding a tummy tuck it is important to recognize what the procedure treats and what it doesn’t. There are four tissue variables that determine what the abdomen looks like. In other words, if somebody doesn’t like the way their belly looks It is always because of one or more of four different tissue variables. The four different tissue variables that determine what the abdomen looks like our abdominal skin laxity typically due to previous pregnancies or weight loss, excess, subcutaneous fat, muscle separation from previous pregnancy, and lastly, excess visceral or intra-abdominal fat. Based on your pictures, your abdomen bulges significantly. This is most likely due to a combination of both muscle, separation and excess visceral fat. It’s important to differentiate visceral fat from muscle, separation because individuals who have excess visceral fat are not ideal candidate for a tummy tuck. To differentiate visceral fat from muscle separation, consider laying on your back and seeing if your abdomen goes completely flat. If it does, then the bulging of the abdomen is more likely due to muscle, separation and not visceral fat. If your abdomen still bulges while you’re laying on your back then this indicates that visceral fat is most likely a significant component of why your abdomen looks the way it does. Individuals who have excess visceral fat, should seriously consider weight loss before having a tummy tuck. Tummy tuck results on individuals who have excess visceral fat will often be less than optimal, creating bulging of the upper abdomen. Differentiating different tissue components on someone’s abdomen is fairly straightforward, but missing individuals who have access to visceral fat and recognizing the inherent limitation of the procedure is sometimes overseen. A thorough consultation should have a minimum at least recognize and assess visceral fat as a component in regards to somebody’s candidacy for a tummy tuck. Visceral fat, can only be reduced by weight, loss and individuals who have excess visceral fat, are often displeased and disappointed with tummy tuck outcomes. This is one of the most common missed variables in regards to assessing patient’s candidacy for this procedure. I suggest patients have multiple in person consultations just like you did. There’s no correct number of consultations needed to find the right provider. The more consultations you have the more likely you are to get an accurate assessment, a good understanding of your candidacy for the procedure and better understanding of what treatment options can, and cannot deliver. Judge tummy tuck results based on who gets the most natural looking belly button with a low set scars that follows the anatomic contours, naturally and evenly on both sides, leaving the torso, looking, balanced, appropriate and attractive from all angles, including from behind. Understanding your own candidacy for the procedure is critical in understanding what the procedure can, and cannot deliver. Rather than being disappointed after surgery with a still bulging abdomen it’s far better to accept the inherent limitation of the procedures, and either address visceral fat before scheduling surgery or realize the inherent limitations this condition imposes. The ability to make an accurate assessment based on pictures alone is inherently limited. I am in no way, stating that you’re not a good candidate for a tummy tuck. Your abdomen does appear to have a visceral fat component, which mandates at least addressing this aspect of your candidacy. An extended tummy tuck is probably in your favor, whether it’s called, wraparound, extended, or body lift. Look at correlating before, and after pictures, displayed by providers to get a clear understanding of what the procedure incorporates. You should have a clear understanding of exactly how far the scar will go, and to what extent skin excision will be done in the hands of each provider. I suggest taking this conversation as far as asking specifically if they plan on turning you or repositioning you during surgery. Good luck, Mats Hagstrom MD