Buccal fat pad excision in the right patient is an excellent procedure. My fine colleagues are absolutely correct to worry about using the procedure willy nilly in every young patient with an overly full face in whom the natural history of their faces would eventually produce a beautiful face. However many patients simply have overly full faces in the lower cheek region. And they will have this for most of their life. The bulging buccal fat pads simply prevents their face from being pretty. Often one of their parents has the same feature, even in advanced age. They and their parents suffer with the "chipmunk cheek" look well into advanced age. The natural history of the buccal fat pad is that it shrinks with age. In younger patients it is full. In older patients it is much smaller. In elderly patients it is often almost absent. In fact as patients age we often see what is left of the buccal fat pad slightly bulging out through the disappearing SMAS layer. This is routinely addressed in facelifts in older patients by fixing the SMAS layer on top of the buccal fat pads, a shadow of what they used to be. So where is the shrinkage that supposedly occurs if the fat pad had been removed if the buccal fat pad disappears anyway? By the time the patient has "burned through" their facial fat, fat in the entire face has diminished, both in the buccal fat pad as well as the cheeks and face as a whole. Are we avoiding the surgery on the buccal fat pads that would have an instant and huge benefit (see pictures below) so people can look good when they are 80? One of the features of a beautiful face, both in women and men, is a juxtaposition of the cheekbone area to the cheeks. The cheekbone area is fuller than the cheek area. The S-shaped curve on the 3/4 view is attractive and in fact defines the most beautiful faces of our era. It is possible to augment cheeks, either with fat injection, LiveFill(TM) or cheek implants. However in faces that aesthetically would not benefit from further widening in the cheek area, is that the right choice? Our practice has been a champion of retaining volume in the face with LiveFill(TM) grafts and 100% SMAS preserving facelifts. However, not all volume looks good in all patients. Fat underneath the chin looks bad. Should that be kept so that when the patient gets older they have some spare fat? Should we start a "Save the double chin foundation"? It is simply not beautiful when the cheeks are overly full. In such patients, buccal fat pad removal can be an immediately and profoundly satisfying procedure.