The skin has adhered to the underlying muscle tissue at the location of the semicircular incision and I wanted to know if there is a minimally invasive procedure to untether the skin, remove the adhesions and complete a fat graft without redoing a semi-circular incision. For example, is the Taylor Liberator Subcision approach (a technique that utilizes a small device to remove tethered scars in the face) possible in my scenario? By the way, I'm twelve years post op. Thank you!
June 9, 2024
Answer: Improving the outcome of poorly done gynecomastia surgery I’m afraid the chance of having a high-quality outcome from revision surgery is quite low. Releasing scar tissue will simply create more scar tissue. You can’t release the tethering without it simply returning. Fat transfer is unlikely to be effective because the area is now devoid of sufficient host tissue to support the grafted fat. When all the subcutaneous tissue has been removed and a patient is left with skin on muscle. There is no tissue to graft fat into. If you release the scar tissue, then try to inject fat. I’m afraid all of that injected fat will probably die. This will in turn simply lead to more scar tissue. Fat transfer works the least in areas you need the most. My best recommendation is to find the most experienced plastic surgeons. And the hands of sufficiently experienced providers it should be clear how difficult the situation is, and you should be guided to accepting the fact that a high-quality outcome with a single round of revision surgery is unlikely to give you the result you’re hoping for. Weather trying to improve the outcome is worth it or not is a private discussion that needs to be had between each provider and their patient. The chance of you having a quality outcome from a single round of fat transfer with her without release of scar tissue is in my opinion fairly unlikely. The outcome of your previous procedure is unfortunate. Before undertaking any surgical procedure, I recommend patients ask providers to show examples of previous cases done to get an understanding of what you can expect and to get an understanding of the providers previous experience with similar situations. Personally, I’ve tried this enough times to not feel like putting patients through unsuccessful surgery again. I wish I could be more optimistic, but believe patients deserve to hear the truth. I think anyone who is optimistic about correcting your outcome may be lacking experience. All the very best, Mats Hagstrom MD
Helpful
June 9, 2024
Answer: Improving the outcome of poorly done gynecomastia surgery I’m afraid the chance of having a high-quality outcome from revision surgery is quite low. Releasing scar tissue will simply create more scar tissue. You can’t release the tethering without it simply returning. Fat transfer is unlikely to be effective because the area is now devoid of sufficient host tissue to support the grafted fat. When all the subcutaneous tissue has been removed and a patient is left with skin on muscle. There is no tissue to graft fat into. If you release the scar tissue, then try to inject fat. I’m afraid all of that injected fat will probably die. This will in turn simply lead to more scar tissue. Fat transfer works the least in areas you need the most. My best recommendation is to find the most experienced plastic surgeons. And the hands of sufficiently experienced providers it should be clear how difficult the situation is, and you should be guided to accepting the fact that a high-quality outcome with a single round of revision surgery is unlikely to give you the result you’re hoping for. Weather trying to improve the outcome is worth it or not is a private discussion that needs to be had between each provider and their patient. The chance of you having a quality outcome from a single round of fat transfer with her without release of scar tissue is in my opinion fairly unlikely. The outcome of your previous procedure is unfortunate. Before undertaking any surgical procedure, I recommend patients ask providers to show examples of previous cases done to get an understanding of what you can expect and to get an understanding of the providers previous experience with similar situations. Personally, I’ve tried this enough times to not feel like putting patients through unsuccessful surgery again. I wish I could be more optimistic, but believe patients deserve to hear the truth. I think anyone who is optimistic about correcting your outcome may be lacking experience. All the very best, Mats Hagstrom MD
Helpful