This is a really thoughtful question, and I think you’re asking exactly the right thing: “Can fillers realistically give me the kind of front-facing jawline I want, or would I ultimately be better served by skeletal surgery such as genioplasty and angle implants?” Based on your photos and the reference result you included, I’d approach this by separating soft-tissue contouring from skeletal structure. The short answer Fillers can definitely improve the appearance of a jawline from the front, especially by: creating a sharper mandibular border, increasing chin width and projection, reducing the appearance of lower-face softness, and improving the transition from the chin to the jaw angles. However, the type of dramatic transformation shown in many “before and after” inspiration photos is often achieved when there is underlying bony augmentation (genioplasty, chin implant, jaw angle implants, or orthognathic surgery), not filler alone. Looking at your situation From your photos, the key issue appears to be lower-face structure rather than simply a lack of definition. The jawline is relatively soft from the front, and the chin may not provide enough forward and lateral support to create the strong, angular appearance you’re hoping for. That distinction is important because fillers work best when they enhance an already reasonable framework. They are less effective when the desired result requires significant widening or repositioning of the lower facial skeleton. What fillers could realistically achieve A skilled injector could potentially use high-G’ hyaluronic acid filler (or another structural filler) in the: chin (projection and width), pre-jowl area, mandibular body, and jaw angles to create a noticeably more sculpted lower face. For someone with your anatomy, I would expect: moderate improvement in jawline sharpness, better chin-to-jaw continuity, and a more balanced profile and frontal contour. What I would not expect is a dramatic change in: the overall width of the lower face, the vertical height of the chin, or the underlying bone proportions that create a naturally strong masculine or angular jawline. Comparing the two options Fillers Genioplasty + Angle Implants Non-surgical Surgical Immediate results Longer recovery Reversible (if HA filler) Permanent structural change Good for contour enhancement Best for significant skeletal deficiency Requires maintenance every 12–24 months One-time procedure in most cases Limited ability to create substantial width Can create true lower-face widening and projection A useful way to decide Ask yourself which of these sounds more like your goal: A. “I want my jawline to look sharper, cleaner, and slightly stronger.” → Fillers are a reasonable first step. B. “I want a substantially more angular lower face, stronger chin projection, and noticeably wider jaw from the front, similar to my reference photo.” → Genioplasty with or without angle implants is more likely to achieve that result. My honest opinion from the photos Because you are specifically focused on the front view, I would lean toward surgical consultation if your expectation is a clearly stronger and more angular lower facial structure. Front-facing jawline definition is often limited by the position and width of the chin and mandibular angles, and fillers can only compensate for that to a certain extent before they start adding bulk rather than true definition. That said, I often think a conservative filler trial can be very informative. It allows you to see how much improvement you get from soft-tissue augmentation alone before committing to permanent surgery. If you achieve 70–80% of what you want with filler, you may decide surgery is unnecessary. If the result still feels structurally insufficient, that strongly suggests that skeletal augmentation is the more appropriate long-term investment. My Bottom Line Fillers: good for enhancing and refining your jawline. Genioplasty + angle implants: better for creating a genuinely stronger lower facial structure from the front. Given the degree of change you appear to be hoping for, I suspect you would ultimately be happier with a structural solution (genioplasty, possibly combined with jaw angle augmentation) than with repeated large-volume filler treatments, which can become expensive over time and may never fully reproduce the sharp, skeletal definition seen in your reference image.