I have had four consults and the first 3 drs all said under the muscle. The 4th said over....I know his over work is good as I have seen myself by a friend that referred me to him (she was similar size). I am currently a 32A and ideally a the outcome would be a large C. I have no children. 5'4. 123lbs. I only want silicone and dr #4 said that over would give me the most natural look (I do not want huge torpedo breasts) and that I have plenty of breast tissue. Any input is appreciated! Thx
Answer: Over vs. Under the muscle I would also recommend submuscular placement for the same reasons as most plastics surgeons on here. The implant coverage is superior and the complication rate lower. There is a rare person for whom recommend subglandular implants. I would recommend getting additional opinions if you are still confused and ask the surgeon about your concern. Ultimately, finding a surgeon is a personal decision and you need to find someone you trust and develop a relationship with . Ultimately, not sound patronizing, it is best to let your doctor guide you into making the right decision, just as you would with any professional.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Over vs. Under the muscle I would also recommend submuscular placement for the same reasons as most plastics surgeons on here. The implant coverage is superior and the complication rate lower. There is a rare person for whom recommend subglandular implants. I would recommend getting additional opinions if you are still confused and ask the surgeon about your concern. Ultimately, finding a surgeon is a personal decision and you need to find someone you trust and develop a relationship with . Ultimately, not sound patronizing, it is best to let your doctor guide you into making the right decision, just as you would with any professional.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
October 14, 2013
Answer: Subglandular augmentation
Most surgeons in the USA using modern techniques would advise you have a sub muscular augmentation. This is shown in the three doctors who recommended this. Implants above the muscle have more visibility issues and a higher risk for capsular contracture. Is the last surgeon much older than the others? This may represent a practice that is using older techniques.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
October 14, 2013
Answer: Subglandular augmentation
Most surgeons in the USA using modern techniques would advise you have a sub muscular augmentation. This is shown in the three doctors who recommended this. Implants above the muscle have more visibility issues and a higher risk for capsular contracture. Is the last surgeon much older than the others? This may represent a practice that is using older techniques.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
October 11, 2013
Answer: Over or under the muscle so confused
In my opinion, implants should be placed under the muscle with only rare exceptions. The exception might be a severe tubular breast deformity. you can certainly obtain a very natural result with a sub muscular augmentation and mammography will be more effective with the implant under the muscle.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
October 11, 2013
Answer: Over or under the muscle so confused
In my opinion, implants should be placed under the muscle with only rare exceptions. The exception might be a severe tubular breast deformity. you can certainly obtain a very natural result with a sub muscular augmentation and mammography will be more effective with the implant under the muscle.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
December 16, 2013
Answer: Under the Muscle. Thank you for your question. In my own practice I favor under the muscle implants. It has been my experience that under the muscle looks more natural and tends to hide the implants better specifically in a slender patient such as yourself. There is clear evidence that implants under the muscle have lower rates of capsular contracture and infection. Under the muscle will also provide you with a better mammogram when the time is appropriate. Lastly, should you need a lift or tightening in your future after childbearing, under the muscle preserves the blood supply to the breast better and makes lifting safer when necessary. Best wishes.
Helpful
December 16, 2013
Answer: Under the Muscle. Thank you for your question. In my own practice I favor under the muscle implants. It has been my experience that under the muscle looks more natural and tends to hide the implants better specifically in a slender patient such as yourself. There is clear evidence that implants under the muscle have lower rates of capsular contracture and infection. Under the muscle will also provide you with a better mammogram when the time is appropriate. Lastly, should you need a lift or tightening in your future after childbearing, under the muscle preserves the blood supply to the breast better and makes lifting safer when necessary. Best wishes.
Helpful
October 9, 2013
Answer: Under or over the muscle?
For women with the size breast and body shape like in the photo I would generally recommend under the muscle. It will reduce the incidence of capsule contracture over the long term (10-20 years from now) and will help to give you a "softer" look and reduce the chance of being able to see ripples or wrinkles. This is especially true the larger the implant you want. But good results could certainly be had with a subglandular implant. There is not any right or wrong.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
October 9, 2013
Answer: Under or over the muscle?
For women with the size breast and body shape like in the photo I would generally recommend under the muscle. It will reduce the incidence of capsule contracture over the long term (10-20 years from now) and will help to give you a "softer" look and reduce the chance of being able to see ripples or wrinkles. This is especially true the larger the implant you want. But good results could certainly be had with a subglandular implant. There is not any right or wrong.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful