Based on the photos, your implants appear large with a relatively wide natural space between the breasts and limited medial cleavage. I do not see an obvious photo-only sign of severe capsular contracture, but capsular contracture cannot be diagnosed from photos alone. It depends on how the breast feels, whether the implant is firm or painful, how mobile it is, and whether there is progressive shape distortion or a high-riding implant on exam. A breast lift and cleavage are also separate issues. A lift can raise the nipple and tighten/reshape loose skin, but it does not reliably move the breasts closer together. Cleavage is strongly influenced by your chest width, breast footprint, implant pocket position, soft-tissue thickness, implant profile, and how close the surgeon can safely make the pockets. If the pockets are made too close in an attempt to force cleavage, it can increase the risk of implant malposition or symmastia. At 10 months, much of the settling has already occurred, although subtle changes can still happen. If the breast feels soft and the implant moves normally, the concern may be more about implant position, pocket dimensions, breast anatomy, or expectation mismatch rather than capsular contracture. If the breast is hard, painful, unusually round, high, or becoming more distorted, then capsular contracture should be evaluated in person. The best next step is an in-person exam with your surgeon or a second board-certified plastic surgeon. Possible revision options, depending on the exam, may include pocket adjustment, implant exchange, selective internal support, fat grafting for modest medial/upper-pole blending, or a lift if nipple position and loose skin are truly part of the problem. I would be cautious about any plan promising dramatic cleavage, because the safest and most natural result still has to respect your anatomy.