Doctors in the hair transplant field initially failed to perform the FUE procedure with good results, consistency, efficiency and with minimal transection damage to the grafts, so results were generally poor despite proclamations by many doctors to the contrary in the years prior to 2009. The market demand for FUE started to rise and more and more doctors wanted to offer the technique, but failures plagued the field. What was needed was the robotic technology we envisioned (like the Artas®), but that would be a very expensive engineering project, so most doctors tried to master the manual techniques with a wide variety of instruments developed, at times, by the doctors themselves. Some instruments were good like Dr. Jim Harris’s ‘Safe System’ and some doctors produced terrible instruments that failed to create quality grafts. Many patients became victims of the failures which were all too common. Some of these patients found their way to our office so we became significantly aware of the FUE problem that our 2002 published paper created. In 2006, Restoration Robotics, Inc. was formed with a mission to build a robot for hair transplantation and financed the effort properly. Finally, in 2011 (just 9 years after we published our breakthrough article on FUE and five years after the engineering project was started), Restoration Robotics introduced the Artas® robot which fully addressed the frequent failures seen with the manual FUE process. Some doctors with great experience can perform manual FUE successfully, but the one way to be sure about the quality of the FUE grafts you will get, will be to get a doctor who uses the ARTAS, which levels the playing field for FUE if the doctor does not have significant experience with the Manual FUE process. The best way to find out, ask to see their FUE patients. Some of our FUE patients come to monthly Open House events to show patients like you, what their results look like.