Your understanding of the promotional hype is accurate. Unfortunately, not doing a muscle repair has nothing to do with blood supply to the abdominal skin and "permitting" aggressive liposuction. Let's be clear about what is what. "Smooth Tuck" is a marketing term that is applied to a specific combination of liposuction with a "no umbilical transposition or incision" and "no muscle tightening" short-incision mini tummy tuck. Some patients may undergo umbilical "float" when more skin is removed. But in no Smooth Tuck case is the amount of skin removed similar to the greater degree of skin removal and tightening accomplished with a full tummy tuck. Less skin removal = less improvement = less concern about circulation = opportunity to call this "something new and improved!"
Basically this operation is aggressive abdominal and flank (hip rolls, or love handles) liposuction. This liposuction empties out the overlying skin, which is too loose or inelastic to shrink down appropriately for the degree of fat removed, so a (small) chunk of skin is removed to take-up some of the slack. Review of the "Smooth Tuck" before and after photographs on this plastic surgeon's website clearly show obese patients that have pretty dramatic liposuction results for which a variable degree of skin removal has been made necessary by that liposuction. I find it a bit disingenuous that EVERY patient's "AFTER" photograph shows the patient in underwear or elastic panty that completely covers whatever skin incision and/or residual irregularity or skin laxity remains. And, as with all of our patient photography, the ones shown generally represent the "best" examples, not the "average" results.
To be sure, these results seem pretty good, even in clothing, but at the quoted price of $10000, which is supposedly "a bit less expensive than a standard tummy tuck," most plastic surgeons will be able to perform a full and complete tummy tuck, which should yield better results for most of these kinds of patients.
Neglecting the muscle repair, which is such an important part of tightening and flattening the stretched abdominal wall, and removing only the lower bit of excess skin (similar to a panniculectomy) rather than making an incision around the belly button to release and allow breastbone-to-pubic bone skin tightening is really falling short of the potential improvement available, and it costs the same or more than a full tummy tuck.
As to the claim of "less downtime," each patient still has an incision to heal, and major liposuction to recover from. This recovery takes the same time regardless of the "name" attached to the procedure! The only additional restriction that I would have my tummy tuck patients observe is "No sit-ups or crunches" for 6 weeks after surgery. Otherwise, any tummy tuck patient will recover just as fast (or slow) as the Smooth Tuck procedure patients.
I say these things not to condemn the plastic surgeon who is doing this procedure, and is enough of a "marketer" to name and obtain media exposure for what any board-certified plastic surgeon already does each and every week with their patients. Unfortunately, you, and probably many others, are ready to avoid what is the appropriate procedure and experienced advice, in order to "wait" until this "new operation" (NOT) comes to Canada. Here's the sad news: this procedure has already been in Canada and the US for many years; it just hasn't had this name and it hasn't been promoted as being able to replace tummy tucks with a faster, better, and quicker-recovery (did I forget to say "more expensive") operation. Fads and hype names will continue to come and go. See an experienced ABPS-certified plastic surgeon for good advice--get several opinions if something seems out of line or "too good to be true!"
Or maybe I really should start marketing the Dr. Tholen "PowerLift!"