I am size 34ab 122 lbs 5"4. My doctor didnt help me with the choice as much as I wanted him to. My surgery is oct 25. Silicone are 2k more than saline.
Answer: Rippling Breast Implant Rippling most often occurs when there is insufficient soft tissue coverage due to little overlying body fat and breast tissue. Implants placed beneath the muscle help to minimize this phenomena but the lower and outside breast (as pectoralis muscle is no longer present), towards the cleavage where the muscle thins out or on top of the breast where breast tissue is often lacking are the most common places to see rippling. It is often accentuated with certain positions (e.g. bending over,or leaning). Most of the time, rippling is felt along the outer side of the breast and the inner side of the breast next to the cleavage. Breast implant waviness (rippling) that is felt but not noticeable to the eye is very common and should not be a concern. However, when rippling is visible, patients are often self-conscious about their appearance.Factors that are associated with increased rippling include:Traditional Saline implants (IDEAL® Saline implants less likely)Textured implantsLarge implantsThin patients with low BMIImplants placed above the musclePrior history of ripplingFactors which are less likely to have rippling include:Heavier and larger breasted womenUsing a highly cohesive form-stabile silicone implants (gummy bear)Smooth implantsSmaller implantsSubmuscular placementOnce rippling occurs it is very difficult to correct. Rippling can be minimized by placing a biologic fabrics (e.g. AlloDerm®, Strattice™, SERI®), submuscular conversion if implants are above the muscle, fat transfer, use of adjacent tissue (muscle or fascia) if available, and in persistent cases implant removal and fat transfer. Seek the care of the best board certified plastic surgeon possible with experience in breast revision surgery.#rippling#breastaugmentation
Helpful
Answer: Rippling Breast Implant Rippling most often occurs when there is insufficient soft tissue coverage due to little overlying body fat and breast tissue. Implants placed beneath the muscle help to minimize this phenomena but the lower and outside breast (as pectoralis muscle is no longer present), towards the cleavage where the muscle thins out or on top of the breast where breast tissue is often lacking are the most common places to see rippling. It is often accentuated with certain positions (e.g. bending over,or leaning). Most of the time, rippling is felt along the outer side of the breast and the inner side of the breast next to the cleavage. Breast implant waviness (rippling) that is felt but not noticeable to the eye is very common and should not be a concern. However, when rippling is visible, patients are often self-conscious about their appearance.Factors that are associated with increased rippling include:Traditional Saline implants (IDEAL® Saline implants less likely)Textured implantsLarge implantsThin patients with low BMIImplants placed above the musclePrior history of ripplingFactors which are less likely to have rippling include:Heavier and larger breasted womenUsing a highly cohesive form-stabile silicone implants (gummy bear)Smooth implantsSmaller implantsSubmuscular placementOnce rippling occurs it is very difficult to correct. Rippling can be minimized by placing a biologic fabrics (e.g. AlloDerm®, Strattice™, SERI®), submuscular conversion if implants are above the muscle, fat transfer, use of adjacent tissue (muscle or fascia) if available, and in persistent cases implant removal and fat transfer. Seek the care of the best board certified plastic surgeon possible with experience in breast revision surgery.#rippling#breastaugmentation
Helpful
August 31, 2013
Answer: Rippling
The thickness of your skin envelope and the amount of natural breast tissue will have the greatest impact on whether or not you have problems with rippling. Silicone implants certainly would lower that risk. The gel implants should only cost about $1000 more than the saline. Textured saline implants also have less rippling. They are not my usual choice for my patients, but certainly are an option.
Helpful
August 31, 2013
Answer: Rippling
The thickness of your skin envelope and the amount of natural breast tissue will have the greatest impact on whether or not you have problems with rippling. Silicone implants certainly would lower that risk. The gel implants should only cost about $1000 more than the saline. Textured saline implants also have less rippling. They are not my usual choice for my patients, but certainly are an option.
Helpful
August 26, 2013
Answer: What is the Chance of Rippling in Saline Implants?
Nobody can give you an exact percentage of rippling in saline implants because there are many variables which effect this. You are better suited for silicone implants because you are thin and have small breasts. However, as you discovered they are more expensive. You can try saline and probably you will not have rippling. If you do, you can have new silicone implants placed under local anesthesia when you can afford them.
Helpful
August 26, 2013
Answer: What is the Chance of Rippling in Saline Implants?
Nobody can give you an exact percentage of rippling in saline implants because there are many variables which effect this. You are better suited for silicone implants because you are thin and have small breasts. However, as you discovered they are more expensive. You can try saline and probably you will not have rippling. If you do, you can have new silicone implants placed under local anesthesia when you can afford them.
Helpful
April 11, 2017
Answer: Silicone vs. Saline Breast Implants Thank you for your question and appropriate picture. The main advantage of silicone implants are the feel and decreased chance of rippling compared to saline implants. Having said that, if you don't plan on being much larger say full B cup, then the ratio of your breast tissue to implant is still favorable and you'll have a great result in terms of look and feel. You should discuss this with your surgeon again and weigh the risks and benefits. In terms of costs it may be worthwhile to spend more on silicone implants. In my practice, non anatomical silicone breast implants are ~1k more for the cost of the implants. Best of luck.
Helpful
April 11, 2017
Answer: Silicone vs. Saline Breast Implants Thank you for your question and appropriate picture. The main advantage of silicone implants are the feel and decreased chance of rippling compared to saline implants. Having said that, if you don't plan on being much larger say full B cup, then the ratio of your breast tissue to implant is still favorable and you'll have a great result in terms of look and feel. You should discuss this with your surgeon again and weigh the risks and benefits. In terms of costs it may be worthwhile to spend more on silicone implants. In my practice, non anatomical silicone breast implants are ~1k more for the cost of the implants. Best of luck.
Helpful
August 24, 2013
Answer: The question is: Can you afford re-operation to fix rippling?
You are thin and with little breast tissue of your own, so the likelihood of visible or palpable rippling with saline implants is relatively high, even with submuscular placement, which is certainly recommended. No one can give you an "exact" percentage, but I can confidently assert that rippling is ALWAYS more common with saline implants, and that silicone implants RARELY have rippling.
Silicone cohesive gel implants are so superior in "feel," natural softness, and homogeneity with breast tissue that (with my encouragement) over 98% of my patients choose silicone gel implants rather than saline. (Our cost for silicone breast augmentation is just under $6000; saline breast augmentation is $5400, so $2K difference seems high, even by New Jersey standards!) Every one of my office staff who previously had saline breast implants has undergone switch to silicone. There's a reason for this, especially since they see all patients with both kinds of implants and really end up knowing which are "best." With all issues, not just rippling!
Don't get me wrong; for 15 years (during the FDA restrictions between 1991 and 2006) we also used (mostly) saline breast implants and had many happy and satisfied patients. But those who had a higher likelihood of dissatisfaction were similar to your anatomy, and we have even more satisfied patients now that we utilize predominantly the newest generation of cohesive silicone gel implants! Honest.
If you "can't afford" silicone implants, either wait and save up for silicone, or fly to Minneapolis for a less costly operation (with the right implants). I'll bet you can pay for the flight and hotel, as well as the surgery, for less than you are paying now!
Going ahead with saline may end up being the costliest mistake you make, especially if you have to have another operation to place the silicone implants you "should have had" in the first place. Consider this carefully. Best wishes! Dr. Tholen
Helpful
August 24, 2013
Answer: The question is: Can you afford re-operation to fix rippling?
You are thin and with little breast tissue of your own, so the likelihood of visible or palpable rippling with saline implants is relatively high, even with submuscular placement, which is certainly recommended. No one can give you an "exact" percentage, but I can confidently assert that rippling is ALWAYS more common with saline implants, and that silicone implants RARELY have rippling.
Silicone cohesive gel implants are so superior in "feel," natural softness, and homogeneity with breast tissue that (with my encouragement) over 98% of my patients choose silicone gel implants rather than saline. (Our cost for silicone breast augmentation is just under $6000; saline breast augmentation is $5400, so $2K difference seems high, even by New Jersey standards!) Every one of my office staff who previously had saline breast implants has undergone switch to silicone. There's a reason for this, especially since they see all patients with both kinds of implants and really end up knowing which are "best." With all issues, not just rippling!
Don't get me wrong; for 15 years (during the FDA restrictions between 1991 and 2006) we also used (mostly) saline breast implants and had many happy and satisfied patients. But those who had a higher likelihood of dissatisfaction were similar to your anatomy, and we have even more satisfied patients now that we utilize predominantly the newest generation of cohesive silicone gel implants! Honest.
If you "can't afford" silicone implants, either wait and save up for silicone, or fly to Minneapolis for a less costly operation (with the right implants). I'll bet you can pay for the flight and hotel, as well as the surgery, for less than you are paying now!
Going ahead with saline may end up being the costliest mistake you make, especially if you have to have another operation to place the silicone implants you "should have had" in the first place. Consider this carefully. Best wishes! Dr. Tholen
Helpful