Congratulations on a 200-pound weight loss — that is a huge achievement. The core difference between the two is the direction of skin they remove. A standard circumferential (360) tightens your whole trunk from top to bottom and removes a belt of skin all the way around, but it does not take in side-to-side (horizontal) looseness across the upper abdomen. The FDL adds a vertical midline incision specifically to remove that horizontal excess and cinch the waist. So the real question is how much side-to-side loose skin you have, especially in your upper belly. Looking at your photos, a few things stand out. You have lost the weight beautifully and are now slim, so this is about loose skin, not fat. On your front view, the laxity is not only up-and-down — there is clear horizontal, side-to-side crinkling and redundant skin extending across your upper abdomen, not just a lower apron. That upper-abdominal, transverse looseness is exactly the pattern a standard 360 tends to leave behind, because a circumferential tuck mainly tightens vertically and around the trunk rather than across the width of the belly. From these images, you look like someone who would most likely get a noticeably flatter, tighter upper abdomen with the FDL component, whereas a 360 alone could leave residual horizontal crinkling up top. I do understand not wanting the central incision, and it is a fair priority — the vertical scar is permanent and visible, and that is a real trade-off against a flatter contour. What I can tell you from photos is only an estimate; the definitive test is an in-person exam where the surgeon pinches your upper abdominal skin to see how much it gathers side-to-side versus up-and-down. If most of your excess turns out to be vertical, a 360 may be enough; but given the horizontal looseness visible in your photos, I would want you to go into your consultation prepared for the likelihood that an FDL would give you the result you are hoping for, and to weigh that against your wish to avoid the midline scar.