What implant fits petite/flat chested female with minimal breast tissue and athletic body due to intensive exercise? (Photos)

The most sophisticated approach to breast augmentation is through the armpit with a surgical camera (transaxillary endoscopic). Using this modern approach the space can be crafted under direct vision, with virtually no bleeding and no postoperative bruising. Most importantly, the shape of the breast is meticulously created. The other, older methods of insertion are technologically less advanced. Both silicone and saline implants can be placed through the armpit by a surgeon with skill and experience using this approach. The incision in the crease is the oldest method of placing the implants and puts a scar directly on the breast.

A round implant would be a better choice because they move more like breasts. The anatomic implants have a textured surface which makes them feel very unnatural. In addition, there is no benefit to anatomical. There is an X-Ray study that shows the implants from the side at 6 months. Standing, the round and the antomical implants have the same profile. When you lie down however, the anatomical implants do not change, which is unnatural. A round implant will change when you lie down, like a natural breast would.

HP implants, which are a more modern shape than moderate profile implants, fit most women better. They have a more appropriate base diameter and can be made to look very natural or very augmented, depending on where in the range the implants are filled to achieve a particular volume. High profile implants are the first choice in my opinion. I rarely find an indication to use moderate or moderate plus implants. The subtlety in the final outcome is not achieved by which profile implant is used, it is determined by the skill in the creation of the pocket, the choice of volume, and where in the range the implant is filled.

There are many advantages to sub muscular dual plane placement and very many disadvantages to sub glandular placement.  I would see no indication to do anything but sub muscular dual plane.  Subglandular silicone implant placement is the historical approach to this surgery, and was widely used in the 1960's.  The implant edges are more visible, the risk of rippling is higher, the implant is in contact with the non-sterile breast tissue so the risk of infection and capsular contracture is higher.  The interface between the breast tissue and the muscle is blurred so the implant interferes with mammography more than sub muscular placement. Submuscular does not affect breast feeding. The blood supply surrounding the implant is worse so the risk of capsular contracture is higher.  The support for the implant is less so there is more long term shape abnormalities and sagging.  The look of a sub glandular implant is much less appealing than a sub muscular implant.  The placement of sub glandular implants makes any subsequent revision surgeries more complicated and less successful.  There are no advantages to sub glandular implant placement.

The choice between saline and silicone is one that requires a complex discussion of all of the advantages and disadvantages of both implants. The issues to be considered are safety, density, mobility, rippling, rupture rate, consequences of rupture, detection of rupture, need for follow-up care, cost of follow-up, appearance, feel, sensation of heaviness, radio-density, mammograms, and costs, among other things. There are advantages and disadvantages of both products. The decision will ultimately be up to you based on what is appropriate for your particular situation. Beautiful results can be obtained with either implant.

The best way to determine the size that fits your personal perception of the perfect breast is to try on sizers. This way you can see how they fit on you, how they add to your current volume, and whether they fit your frame. Although the surgeon can guide you, only you will be able to tell what is the right size. Try on sizers. Measuring a diameter and then telling the patient what volume they can have (in high, moderate or moderate plus implants) in my mind is backwards. The patients should be allowed to choose the volume. Then the surgeon carefully considers the base diameter, projection, profile, manufacturer, and fill material that will achieve the patients goals of size as well as qualitative look (natural, intermediate, or bold upper pole fullness or projection), all the while taking into consideration the patient's anatomic features that will affect the outcome. The experience of the surgeon and the degree to which they explain the options to you is of utmost importance. The subtlety in the final outcome is not achieved by which profile implant is used, it is determined by the skill in the creation of the pocket, the choice of implant. Don't let the doctor tell you what would look good on you. They cannot tell what you perceive to be the best size. There is no maximum. That is up to you.

Smooth round gel implants will give fantastic results. Size would be tailored to your body and goals.An exam and consultation with a plastic surgeon is recommended to discuss your options and expectations.

Thank you for your question! Picking an implant is a very detailed process between you and your doctor. You need to be on the same page as far as your desired look. I would recommend coming to your consultation with a few pictures you like of breasts and showing them to your doctor. Also, in my office we use the Vectra 3D which allows the patient to see a 3D image of themselves with different style and size implants. Also, you should try on a t shirt And bra with different sizes during your consultation to see which size you like better on your frame.  Based on your pictures, I would recommend a smooth round silicone implant. I do not use anatomical (shaped) implants unless they can help you lift the breast which you do not need) However, it is important to consult during an in person consultation to assess your anatomical proportions and pick the correct size and style for you.Also you should consider more cohesive implants. You have so little tissue that rippling can be a problemI would recommend axillary (armpit) endoscopic approach to avoid visible scars on the breasts

Thank you for your question.  I find that most of my patients do extremely well with Silicone smooth round implants. They tend to look and feel very natural.  I would also recommend using a smaller implant.  Best of luck to you. 

Hello,Thanks for your question!It may be helpful to bring wish pics to a consultation to try an achieve a look you like best. It depends on what you would like as the final result. An in person consultation may be best!You can learn more on our social media (Instagram and Snapchat): @realdrsix.
Regards,

Hello, I use almost exclusively smooth round implants these days.  I have exchanged a number of the teardrop implants for round implants so this has an immediate way for me to see the different shape the two implants provide.  In my experience the difference is usually subtle.  For my patients with little breast tissue I recommend conservatively smaller implants to try to decrease the risk of rippling, palpability and other problems.  You will get the best advice during an in-person consultation including a proper breast exam, but I hope my perspective helps.

hello thank you for your question and provided information as well.. based in your question and the picture you showed you are a good candidate for breast augmentation  with implant in your case for best result you can apply for position sub muscular , its recommended if you get a consultation in person with a plastic surgeon to determinate how many cc do you need to the better results.

Thank you for your question.  As an experience plastic surgery with a large portion my practice is dedicated to revisionary surgery, I have a unique perspective as to smooth round implants versus anatomic textured implants. I went through a period of approximately 2 years in which I used anatomically-shaped textured implants, and I found that they didn't look any more or less natural and smooth round implants. There was a study approximately 2 years ago which supported this observation in which several surgeons looked at different pictures of smooth round implanted patients and textured anatomic implanted patients and couldn't tell the difference.  In my experience, I feel more comfortable with smooth round implants, especially in light of the new connection between ALCL and textured implants. Type some implants can achieve an excellent cosmetic outcome.  I wish you the best.

The less breast tissue you have the more you need a shaped implant to give your breast the shape that it lacks. Therefore I understand why shaped implants have been recommended to you. There are however problems with shaped implants in an active person.  Problems like double capsule, seroma formation, possible rotation, rippling and the very rare but worrisome ALCL. You should see a plastic surgeon who is willing to listen to your concerns, consider your lifestyle, give you options and work with you to achieve your goals. Textured, shaped silicone or round smooth or even Ideal Implants are available and with proper planning they could all give you good results. You could even consider a hybrid situation where a round smooth implant could be used with fat grafting to give your breast shape. 

You ask an excellent question which seems to have attracted a lot of answers. Given your physique, a textured anatomic implant would be great. However, given your lifestyle with dance and exercise, I would recommend a smooth highly cohesive implant, which is essentially a round anatomic. It combines the low rippling chances of the anatomic device with the advantages of the round device. These and many other options are best discussed during an in person consultation with a board certified plastic surgeon. Good luck!