Dear Gullu, No, and it is a disaster in terms of looking bad. We are going to look at an example where it is possible, but not in your case. We want the nipple leval to be at or above the level of the inframammary fold. If it is and you put an implant in the nipple/areola will come forward or up slightly and out. It can look OK, but not perky. If the nipple is a bit below the fold, and increasingly so as the breast becomes more droopier, to even pinting down (grade III ptosis), the breast falls down over the implant with a big bulge above the nipple/areola (known as waterfall or Snoopy appearance). In such cases the distance from the sternal notch to the nipple is usually 23 cm or more. In your photo, it looks like your arms are pulling up and back in the lateral views, cnofusing the issue of there the nipple is in relation to the fold for surgical planning. In the front view, it clearly shows the areola and breast are too low relative to where the implant will be to get a good result. You can also draw a line in an arc from the little indent fold at the side of your chest by the top of the breast, over t the upper cleavage fold. If you drop a line down from the middle of that arc toward the nipple and measure down 9-9.5 cm, if that is not where the nipple is, it is too low to use an implant without a lift. see photo link.