Switching Breast Implants from Submuscular to Subglandular

Saline and Silicone, Safety and PerformanceWomen have so far had essentially just two breast implant fill choices: saline or silicone.Silicone implants have distinct advantages over saline implants in terms of performance: they wrinkle less and conform to a more natural breast shape, and also have a softer feel that is more breast-like. However, silicone implants have gained a reputation—possibly undeserved—for being less safe than saline implants. Despite the fact that there is no known toxicity of silicone gel breast implants, the possibility of a “silent rupture,” undetectable except by MRI, has been enough to make many women opt for saline implants or wait for a better product to come along. The time will be here most likely within a year or so with the advent of the Ideal Implant, the name given to a new design saline hybrid implant. It has the natural feel of silicone and safety of saline.The Ideal Implant has bothThe Ideal Implant is one of the major technological advances to come along in the past few decades in implant manufacture. Using a novel design with internal baffles, the saline implant is manufactured to achieve a similar feel and performance comparable to a silicone implant. Approximately 95% of both patients and their surgeons expressed satisfaction at the current two-year data point by the FDA. The Ideal Breast Implant is now FDA approved and soon to be released in the US market, hopefully with in the year.

Thank you for the question.

Generally, it is possible to remove implants from the sub muscular position and replace them in the subglandular  position  depending on the specific patient's anatomy/situation.  You will need to be evaluated in person by a well experienced plastic surgeon to see if this would work for you.

Having said that,  you should be aware that there are many potential downsides of breast implants placed in the sub glandular position. These downsides should be weighed against the current issues you are experiencing.

Although breast implants in the sub muscular ( or dual plane)  position may experience “distortion” with muscle movement (workout) I still think it is in your best interests (and that of most patients seeking breast augmentation surgery) to have implants placed in the “dual plane” sub muscular position.  This positioning allows for more complete coverage of the breast implants leading to generally more natural feel/look  of the implants in the long-term. This position will also decrease the potential for rippling and/or palpability  of the implants (which may increase with time, weight loss, and/or post-pregnancy changes).

The submuscular positioning  also tends to interfere with mammography less so than in the sub glandular position. The incidence of breast implant encapsulation (capsular  contraction)  is also decreased with implants placed in the sub muscular position.

I hope this helps.

 

Placing breast implants below the chest muscles help to camouflage the implants, giving a more natural appearance. It also helps to reduce in the risk of infection and capsular contracture.  Somethimes, though, contraction of the pectoralis muscle can make the implant move. This is called an "animation deformity".  Changing the implant to a subglandular (above the muscle) position will eliminate this.  However, this will also make the implant more visible so using a silicone implant is a good idea because it tends to show less rippling than its saline counterpart.