How can I reduce my turkey neck? Generally at a relatively low body fat % (photos)

Morpheus 8 is a non-invasive skin and soft tissue tightening treatment that is consistently amazing in our patients. We use the Morpheus to exact fractional induced RF into the skin or tissue in order to tighten collagen and stimulate contraction of the tissue. For acne scars, it is quite useful to build collagen in patients who have atrophic scars but is not very productive for ice-pick scars which require TCA Cross. For tissue tightening, Morpheus is ideal for the face and neck and we often combine it with CO2 laser or Ultherapy to further enhance results. Chemical peels and skin resurfacing should be done at least 5 to 7 days after, but can be performed earlier, depending on treatment severity. Avoid exfoliating skin treatments before Morpheus and expect a period of 2-4 weeks for skin contraction to set in.

Best,
Dr. Karamanoukian
Realself100 Surgeon

Thank you for your question and sharing your photograph. You seem quite young, so perhaps it’s better to discuss this in person with a surgeon rather than ask questions based on photographs. The images suggest prominence of the digastric muscles and visibility of the lower part of the submandibular glands. This is why, with the floor of the mouth lifted when the tongue is held to the upper palate, part of this is hidden. The same will happen when swallowing, which produces a relatively similar movement.

The procedure that can decrease the volume is the anterior neck lift because liposuction addresses fatty tissue under the skin, and this is not relevant in your situation. The anterior neck lift can deal with centrally seated fatty tissue, a relatively small volume in your case, the volume of the digastric muscles, and the volume of the lower part of the submandibular glands. It is an element that has hereditary roots and, when controlled, also has a lasting effect.

Your workout at the gym most likely involves weights, and this does lead to some increase in the digastric muscles, but probably is inconsequential to the visibility of the submandibular glands.

Since it only takes a small amount of excess fat in the chin area to give a full appearance, even thin people can have fat there. It just depends where the fat pocket is. Often, this is genetic, and not related to overally body weight. Liposuction is a great option for targeted fat removal in this area.

Facial aesthetics is primarily determined by bone structure.
This is especially true when assessing young people.
Bone structure is what gives each unique person their individual appearance, whether it is desirable or not.
Issues related to the lower 1/3 of the face generally related to issues with the shape and size of the mandible.
Individuals who have a small mandible are prone to developing a premature double chin, loss of jawline, definition, and other signs of premature aging.
Even if your mentalist or chin has a strong projection issues further back such as in the body of the mandible, or vertical heights of the mandible can impact how soft tissues drape.
The bone structure is essentially the foundation of what the soft tissue rests upon.
Individuals who have aesthetic ideal looks typically have an ideal, skeletal foundation. Most plastic surgeons are soft tissue oriented and will look at soft tissue solutions to address problems that are sometimes based on skeletal structure.
Whenever treatment doesn’t directly affect the primary problem partial results are the best you can hope for.
You do not have an abnormal fat distribution.
Removing fat isn’t going to do all that much because it isn’t addressing the problem nor do you have a lot of fat to work with.
A neck lift is another option, but again it doesn’t really treat The primary problem, and most people will tell you you’re too young for a neck lift.
Individuals who do become premature candidates for neck lift and facelift surgery often have a facial skeletal structure that is not ideal.
There is no simple treatment that’s going to have a that’s going to have a major impact and attempts at treating the primary problem. I’d probably going to be too extreme to justify the outcome.
I wish I could be more optimistic, but I’d much rather you not have surgery, then have surgery that leads to pour outcomes.
This is only my opinion, and I’m quite sure others will have a more optimistic view.
Best,
Mats Hagstrom, MD