Should I get malar or submalar cheek implants? (Photo)

Great question!  Your concern is a very common issue as we age.  As time continues to tick we will continue to lose volume in this area (and others).  The key to addressing this area is making it look good now and in the future.  Whatever is done in this area needs to fit and enhance your facial features. Cheek implants are a permanent solution but you want to make sure the outline is not visible and the area transitions nicely with your other features.  If you were adamant about implants,I would recommend small or medium combined submalar implants that provide a smoother more natural transition.  I emphasize going smaller and not larger in implant size. It is difficult to correct asymmetry with implants alone.I recommend reconsidering fillers as an option or at least try.  Fillers are the most common tool used for this type of issue. You can correct asymmetry and increase the fullness over time. You can see what type of fullness you like best.  If you do not like the fullness, it will go away or you can get injections to dissolve the material (depending on what you use).  Subtle volume is best treated with fillers.  Fillers allow for gradual improvement and change. Lastly, fillers provide a method for you to visualize the look an implant gives you before you commit to surgery.  You also look to be a great candidate for Sculptra a longer lasting filler option which is great for a natural subtle volume change.

Hi Feronzies -

Thanks for your question! The photos are great. Seeing your cheeks from different angles helps a lot.

Would implants be a good solution for your case? Well, that all
depends on what your goals are.

If your goal is simply to remove the diagonal indentation on your left
cheek, this can be accomplished with a malar implant. But, if your goal is broader than that, and you want your features to look more defined and
strengthened overall, I’d recommend using fillers instead.

Why? Three reasons.You have more control over your results. Fillers can be
easily modified or reversed whenever you want. Let’s say you have a look you’re
going for now that fits where you’re at in life. But when you get older, your
face keeps changing along with you and your tastes. This requires different
levels of augmentation, and one implant isn’t going to take care of that
forever. In fact, it might even be a hindrance to your face in the long run.
(Which brings me to my next point.)Fillers are less risky. Implants are useful, but they
come with a larger list of possible side effects and complications. With fillers, you’ll see your results within a day. With malar
implants, you’ll see results about three to six months later.

Again, this is all about your personal goals. Remember
- the clearer you are about the overall changes you would like to make, the better.

Hope this has helped. Good luck in your research!

Stay Beautiful,

Dr. Mabrie

The area you have outlined on your cheeks is the submalar region. This sits right below the prominence of the cheek bone. (malar region) Cheek concavity results from loss of soft tissue volume not bone loss. At the least you need submalar implants and the use of a combined submalar-malar implant, if not too big, would create the greatest amount of cheek tissue lift.