You are making a very common self-assessment. Every woman wants the "Goldilocks" implants--not too large, not too small, but JUST RIGHT. You are also wise to note that many women later wish they had chosen larger, precisely because they "don't want to be too big." Without knowing you, your lifestyle, and your personality, your anatomy would certainly argue for the large(r) implants. If we were discussing 700cc vs. 800cc, there might need to be more discussion, but I still have detailed discussions with each of my patients prior to surgery, even when the choice is 350 vs. 400cc. Not because I have to know what they want so I can order the "right" size (in our office we stock a full inventory of saline and silicone implants is all sizes and profiles so we don't have that concern), but because I can use slightly smaller or slightly larger based on all the information I have gleaned form my patient right up to the time of surgery, including what I assess about her tissues as I create her pockets in the operating room.Some women are intrinsically conservative, are the most fearful of "being too large," and would truly be the most likely candidate for the smaller of your two choices. Paradoxically, these women often seem to be the ones who later most regret not going with the larger choice! Not always, but so frequently that I ask many questions to discern their real attitudes before I go into the operating room.Others are more "go for the gusto" and the choice is easier for them--just go with the larger implants.Remember, we are NOT choosing between "Oh my God" or "Why bother," you are asking about 3 tablespoons and 1 teaspoon difference. BTW, this amount is scarcely visible, and why implants come in those gradations--they are intentionally made that way to be at or below the threshold of visible difference!You will look great with either size choice. I would question your use of textured shaped implants, however. These cost more, require a larger incision, are rotationally sensitive (must be placed in "perfect" position to avoid asymmetry since they adhere to the tissues and won't move or rotate), do not drop, settle, or flatten out when reclining or standing (they stay teardrop-shaped in all positions--in my mind, this is decidedly NON-anatomic, since natural breasts flatten and drop slightly to the side of the chest when reclining), and they feel more firm compared to smooth round implants. Remember, smooth round implants are less costly (still cohesive; do not "leak;" and do NOT require periodic MRI scans IMHO), require a smaller incision, are NOT rotationally sensitive (round, so there is no up or down position), and they drop and settle as things heal, giving a nice teardrop shape when standing and a flatter, round shape when reclining, just like "real" breasts, AND they feel more soft. And, did I say they will save you some money? You just need to be sure your surgeon is comfortable with smooth round implants vs textured teardrop-shaped, since the pockets and positioning must take into account their differences. If your surgeon "only uses one kind of implant" you may wish to get additional opinions.Ultimately, choice of surgeon is much more important than choice of implants. Either choice will give you great results, but I would recommend smooth, round, cohesive silicone implants, and probably the 400s. For more information, you may wish to read my Comprehensive Guide to Breast Augmentation by clicking on the web reference link below. There is a whole section on choosing implants, including type, size, and all of the various options. Best wishes! Dr. Tholen