I’m an Asian female and got “subfacial” silicone breast implant above the muscle. Since my initial procedure I have gotten CC in both breasts on separate occasions (2 separate revisions). I’ve developed cc again in the right breast and been advised to remove both and place then under the muscle. One doc told me I need to remove them completely for 3-4mo for my skin to reattach to my chest wall before reinserting the implant. Another doctor mentioned nothing about this. What’s the right protocol?
September 19, 2023
Answer: Sub glandular chronic capsular contractions One of the benefits of some pectoral placement of breast implants is that it lowers the incidence of capsular contractions. Different plastic surgeons well, I have different opinions. The choice of doing this as a stage procedure can be influenced by a variety of factors. When patients have multiple recurrent capsular contractions, the likelihood that there is a staph epidermidis contamination becomes more real. This is a very slow, growing bacteria that cannot be treated without antibiotics. It is difficult to make an accurate diagnosis if the capsule or implant is contaminated with the bacteria. Staphylococcus epidermidis contamination is probably the most likely explanation for patients who continue having capsular contracture’s again and again. The bacteria cannot be completely eliminated, but attempts should be made to eliminate the contamination as much as possible, and this would be better done with a complete capsulectomy and implant removal and delayed augmentation in the subpectoral plane. When converting from some glandular to some pectoral, there’s also a risk that the implant can move back into the old position. Simply speaking it, surgeon will have their own way of doing this and there are a lot of variables to take into consideration, justifying different approaches. There is no one single gold standard. For someone who has had multiple capsular contractions and wants to maintain augmentation long-term I would take the most conservative approach. This would be undergoing implant removal with complete capsulectomy, followed by delayed augmentation in a different plane, preferably sun-pectorally. In my opinion, there is no fascial plan over the pectoralis muscle. I don’t know what somebody mean when they say sub fascial placement of the implants since the pectoralis muscle has no fascia to speak of other than at the insertion. That said, there are also some good advantages for doing immediate repositioning from sun glandular to sub pectoral. I would probably do this as a single procedure if you didn’t have the history of multiple capsular contraction. Your situation is complicated and having had multiple counselor contractures put you at risk for having this complication happen again especially if there is bacterial contamination. Slime Coates from staph epidermidis contamination is not clearly understood by everyone. It is a complex topic and the treatment is not done with antibiotics or how most infections are treated. The bacteria does not cause clinical infections. It is very slow growing, but causes biofilms with pseudoaneurysm’s Along vascular graft and capsular contraction’s around breast implants. On top of this is very difficult to diagnose the presence of staph epidermidis in the breast implant capsule. The micro organisms cannot be grown in the laboratory. It to be identified by trying to separate the bacteria, using ultrasound, and then visualizing them for confirmation of the diagnosis. For most patients and providers it is a diagnosis of exclusion that is usually not confirmed by Testing. It is the most common reason for patients to have ultimate implant failure due to repeated capsular contractions? Make sure you’re working with plastic surgeons who have a lot of breast augmentation experience over many years. Best, Mats Hagstrom, MD
Helpful
September 19, 2023
Answer: Sub glandular chronic capsular contractions One of the benefits of some pectoral placement of breast implants is that it lowers the incidence of capsular contractions. Different plastic surgeons well, I have different opinions. The choice of doing this as a stage procedure can be influenced by a variety of factors. When patients have multiple recurrent capsular contractions, the likelihood that there is a staph epidermidis contamination becomes more real. This is a very slow, growing bacteria that cannot be treated without antibiotics. It is difficult to make an accurate diagnosis if the capsule or implant is contaminated with the bacteria. Staphylococcus epidermidis contamination is probably the most likely explanation for patients who continue having capsular contracture’s again and again. The bacteria cannot be completely eliminated, but attempts should be made to eliminate the contamination as much as possible, and this would be better done with a complete capsulectomy and implant removal and delayed augmentation in the subpectoral plane. When converting from some glandular to some pectoral, there’s also a risk that the implant can move back into the old position. Simply speaking it, surgeon will have their own way of doing this and there are a lot of variables to take into consideration, justifying different approaches. There is no one single gold standard. For someone who has had multiple capsular contractions and wants to maintain augmentation long-term I would take the most conservative approach. This would be undergoing implant removal with complete capsulectomy, followed by delayed augmentation in a different plane, preferably sun-pectorally. In my opinion, there is no fascial plan over the pectoralis muscle. I don’t know what somebody mean when they say sub fascial placement of the implants since the pectoralis muscle has no fascia to speak of other than at the insertion. That said, there are also some good advantages for doing immediate repositioning from sun glandular to sub pectoral. I would probably do this as a single procedure if you didn’t have the history of multiple capsular contraction. Your situation is complicated and having had multiple counselor contractures put you at risk for having this complication happen again especially if there is bacterial contamination. Slime Coates from staph epidermidis contamination is not clearly understood by everyone. It is a complex topic and the treatment is not done with antibiotics or how most infections are treated. The bacteria does not cause clinical infections. It is very slow growing, but causes biofilms with pseudoaneurysm’s Along vascular graft and capsular contraction’s around breast implants. On top of this is very difficult to diagnose the presence of staph epidermidis in the breast implant capsule. The micro organisms cannot be grown in the laboratory. It to be identified by trying to separate the bacteria, using ultrasound, and then visualizing them for confirmation of the diagnosis. For most patients and providers it is a diagnosis of exclusion that is usually not confirmed by Testing. It is the most common reason for patients to have ultimate implant failure due to repeated capsular contractions? Make sure you’re working with plastic surgeons who have a lot of breast augmentation experience over many years. Best, Mats Hagstrom, MD
Helpful