Assessing why breast augmentations look the way they do can be a little bit tricky. When the breast begins drop down, it’s important to recognize if the weakness is in the IMF or if it’s the breast tissue and skin that’s being stretched out. Implants are placed under the muscle with sufficient amount of muscle, supporting the implant that the muscle itself is holding the implant on the chest wall. If the implants are placed above the muscle or if a significant part of the muscle is transfected (sometimes called dual plane augmentation )then the weight of the implant is being carried by the soft tissue under the implant. it’s hard to tell from the pictures, but it doesn’t look like your IMF is dropping down. It looks like your breast tissue is stretching out. That tells me that the weight of the implant is stretching your breast tissue and the implant is not held in place by the pectoralis muscle. this is a little different than an implant bottoming out. When the implant bottoms out the structure of the IMF has been lost. I think the first thing to understand is if your implants were placed above or below the muscle. ThatI think the first thing to understand is if you’re implants were placed above or below the muscle. That would make a big difference in what the next step would be. A breast lift is typically on the indicated when the nipple position is low. In your case, the nipple position is not low and there’s no indication to do a breast lift because of nipple position. It’s more that this soft tissue is dropping, but it appears to be in front of the IMF. I think it’s hard to tell from the information provided. I suggest you lie on in person second opinion consultations. For second opinion consultations come prepared bringing with you a complete set of proper before and after pictures for each of your previous procedures and copies of all of your previous operative reports. If you’ve been working with the same surgeon, then simply ask for the entire medical record, including all of your before and after pictures. If you initial surgery was done by a different provider then try to get the medical records from that surgery if possible. I think it’s important to understand what tissue is supporting the implant right now.A good assessment needs to include an understanding of all the previous procedures. A simplistic approach without an appreciation of why you’re having the problem is likely to lead to continued problems with continued revisions. Insufficient information increases the chance of making an error in understanding the true ideology of the problem. Sometimes having had implants for many years, takes its toll on the tissues, and a lot of this depends on how well the initial foundation was created to support the implant. Again, this generally has to do with if the pectoralis muscle is supporting the weight of the implant or if the implant is being pushed against the lower tissues. Describing the problem in writing is about as difficult as trying to describe a potential solution. In the end, the most important variable is provider selection. Best, Mats Hagstrom MD