Just diagnosed with biofilm infection. What will I look like following tear trough implant removal (silicone)? (photos)

Your second photo appears to show redness by your left tear trough implant. I believe it would be unusual to have an infectious process like biofilm affecting both implants, however, inflammation and diffuse redness from biofilm is associated with HA injectable fillers where multiple treated areas appear red and inflamed. 

Without examining you, we cannot give specific advice for your situation. If there is chronic or recurrent inflammation of silicone implants, removal may be curative. 



Try not to worry about the after effects. Once swelling resolves after implant removal, there may be several options for addressing hollowing should it occur.



Keep us posted, and don't hesitate getting a third opinion from a specialist familiar with the placement and removal of silicone tear trough implants. Wishing you well moving forward. Dr Joseph

All implants have the possibility of becoming infected.  It is very hard to clear these infections with antibiotics.  The biofilm on the implant protects the bacteria from the antibiotics.  The only practical treatment is removal of the implant.  Generally I advise that the implant be removed in these circumstances.  Regarding the timing of replacing the implant, ideally the implant is replaced long after the tissues have healed.  I recommend 6 months but surgeons will have different ideas about this.  Obviously the area will look much less full than it does now.  When the implant is replaced, it is a good idea to use a different approach for its replacement rather than putting in through the mouth.

First, let me say how sorry I am that you are having this problem. From your description, it does seem prudent to remove the foreign body implants. Additional treatment with appropriate antibiotics and antiinflammatory agents may be needed. Once you are symptom free for several months, post-fat removal surgical hollows and residual tear troughs under the eyes may be addressed via the use of fillers, which has become one of the most common procedures in recent years as as a first choice in lieu of invasive surgical blepharoplasty and implant procedures. In experienced hands, filler injections usually take less than five minutes per under eye to perform, and the results typically engender an immediate "Wow!" reaction and little to no downtime. So, you can relax on this score. When the time comes, be sure you consult with a board certified aesthetic physician with experience and expertise in nonsurgical eye rejuvenation. And be certain to ask to see his/her before and after photos before agreeing to proceed. Wishing you the best.

Tough to say that this is an actual biofilm without a biopsy and culture.  However if you have chronic inflammation over any implant that does not respond to antibiotics, they need to be removed.  You will be a little flat initially.  Once everything is non-inflammed you should be able to put some HA filler in there.  BUt need to wait until all evidence of injection and inflammation resolved. 

Taking a different approach, I think that permanent facial implants are problematic implants and should rarely be done, especially if fillers, even though temporary, could be done.Infected implants need to be removed and will leave deformity, which could then be treated.