42 - is it time for a facelift? (Photo)

Question

42 years old and was advised to start sculptra and RF microneedling. Would rather not dump money into short lived/minimal results if a facelift/lower bleph would be better. Tired of looking tired.

Muhsin Yilmaz, MD, FEBOPRAS · Answer

Your age alone does not determine whether you need a facelift. What matters more is the degree of skin laxity, the position of the facial tissues, and whether your concerns are mainly related to the lower face, neck, eyelids, or skin quality.
From a single frontal photo, a definitive recommendation is not possible. RF microneedling may improve skin quality, but it will not replace surgery if the main issue is deeper tissue laxity. An in-person assessment with a plastic surgeon would be the best next step.

Philip Wasicek, MD · Answer

Hello, 
The summary (TL;DR): More is usually more in facial aesthetics. 
At 42, there are many patients who are in the “in-between” stage &mdash; where they are bothered by some features of aging, but may not yet need a full facelift depending on their anatomy and goals.
Sculptra and RF microneedling can absolutely have a role, particularly for skin quality, collagen stimulation, mild volume loss, and crepey skin.
However, these treatments generally produce more subtle and gradual improvement. They do not reposition descended facial tissues the way surgery can. For patients who are already bothered by looking “tired,” especially around the jawline, neck, or lower eyelids, nonsurgical treatments can sometimes become expensive maintenance with limited satisfaction if the underlying issue is tissue descent or excess skin/fat.
Lower blepharoplasty, in particular, can make a significant difference in patients whose tired appearance is driven by under-eye bags, shadowing, excess lower eyelid skin, and midface/cheek transition changes. Looking "tired."
Similarly, facelift surgery addresses structural facial aging in a way that injectables and RF treatments cannot.
That said, age alone does not determine whether someone is a facelift candidate. I routinely see patients in their early 40s who are excellent candidates for facial rejuvenation surgery, while others may benefit more from less invasive options. 
In many cases, the best approach is actually a combination:
The key is determining what is truly bothering you and understanding what to expect from each tool. If the primary issue is structural aging and tissue descent, surgery often provides a more meaningful and longer-lasting improvement than repeatedly chasing subtle nonsurgical treatments.
I would recommend you have an in-person consultation with a board certified plastic surgeon who specializes in facial aesthetics and facelifts. 
Hope this helps.

Young Min Im, MD, PHD · Answer

The first signs of aging usually begin to appear around the eyes and mouth. Looking at your photos, the hollowness and protrusion under the eyes appear quite significant, and the wrinkles have become deeply set.
In addition, there is noticeable depth and volume loss in the nasolabial folds, along with a heavy appearance overlying that area, extending into the marionette lines. The jawline also does not appear smooth, and there is considerable skin laxity and sagging visible overall.
Surgery itself is not determined simply by age. Rather, the appropriate procedure is considered based on each person’s current condition and what areas can be improved. Based on your photos, it appears that a facelift and neck lift, platysma muscle tightening, and lower blepharoplasty would likely be recommended.
Recently, the age at which people choose to undergo facelift and neck lift surgery has been becoming younger. In many cases, having the surgery before aging becomes too advanced can lead to more effective results and help maintain a youthful appearance for a longer period of time.

Andrew Miller, MD · Answer

Based on your photo, you are at least a good candidate for a minifacelift which will give a much better result than RF microneedling can ever give. Your lower lids can be improved at the same time. Just be sure to see a facial specialist for consultation to get a good exam and go over everything.

Ali Riza Öreroglu, MD · Answer

Looking at your photo, there is mild to moderate sagging in the midface and lower face, along with a tired overall expression. Device-based treatments (such as RF microneedling or Sculptra) typically provide only temporary and limited improvement at this stage and do not create true structural change.
For this reason, when the goal is a long-lasting and more significant facial rejuvenation, I prefer a surgical approach. The most effective and natural-looking option in such cases is a facelift, particularly a deep plane facelift. This technique repositions the descended midface, cheek, and jawline tissues in an anatomical way, resulting in a more durable and natural lifting effect.
For the under-eye area, which contributes to the tired appearance, I usually combine lower blepharoplasty with conservative fat grafting when needed. This combination helps achieve a more balanced and refreshed appearance across the entire face, not just the lower portion.
Overall, in cases like this, I find that surgical facelift techniques are a more appropriate and permanent solution compared to device-based treatments.

Shitel Patel, MD · Answer

There are many nonsurgical options that can help improve the skin and volume but they will be temporary (last 9 months to 2 years). A deep-plane facelift with lower eyelid surgery can make you look 10-15 years younger and you will carry that forward. So you will always look 10-15 years younger as you grow older. The investment for a facelift is lower than repeating non-surgical options over time. Hope you find your happy and awake solution that fits your life.

Frank Agullo, MD · Answer

Forty-two years of age is borderline. Your tired appearance stems from under-eye hollowness and tear trough hollowing. There is significan cheek sagging and jowling. I suggest a lower bleph. Adding some localized facial fat graft in the same procedure will age far better than another cycle of Sculptra combined with RF microneedling. Typically, a second biostimulatory cycle is far less impressive than the first.

I do recommend a deep plane facelift open or endoscopic. The outcome will hold for over a decade.

#StayBeautiful,

@RealDrWorldWide

I do recommend a deep plane facelift open or endoscopic. The outcome will hold for over a decade.

#StayBeautiful,

@RealDrWorldWide

Carlos Alberto Ríos García, MD · Answer

Looking more carefully at your photo and understanding your concern about constantly looking tired, I actually think your issue appears more structural than superficial skin quality alone.
You seem to have:
* early midface descent* heaviness around the nasolabial/marionette area* loss of jawline definition* and lower facial tissue descent creating that fatigued appearance
That is why treatments like RF microneedling or repeated collagen stimulators may give only modest improvement while still not truly correcting the underlying problem.
In a patient like you, a well-executed deep plane facelift &mdash; especially when performed conservatively and naturally &mdash; can sometimes produce a much more meaningful and longer-lasting rejuvenation than years of temporary treatments.
Importantly, younger facelift patients often heal beautifully because:
* skin quality is still relatively good* tissues are healthier* and less aggressive pulling is required
You do not appear “overdone facelift” territory at all. In fact, this is often the age where deep plane techniques can create very elegant and natural rejuvenation because the tissues are repositioned before extreme aging occurs.
You may also benefit from:
* lower blepharoplasty* conservative fat grafting if volume loss is present* or skin quality treatments as complementary procedures
But in my opinion, based on your anatomy and goals, the deeper tissue descent itself appears to be the main issue &mdash; not simply collagen deficiency or skin texture.
In our practice, we frequently evaluate patients in their early 40s seeking a more definitive and natural rejuvenation approach, and many are surprised to learn that a properly performed deep plane facelift can sometimes look *more natural* than years of fillers and repetitive non-surgical treatments.

Keith Hodge, MD · Answer

It appears that you have a tear trough where the lower eyelid meets the cheek. You also may have  the beginnings of a jowl - hard to know with only a front view. Surgical procedures that may benefit you would be a lower blepharoplasty with fat grafting as well as a facelift procedure to elevate the cheeks and eliminate the jowl. Hope this helps!

Semih Yildiz, MD, FEPOBRAS · Answer

At 42, the decision is less about age and more about whether the concern is true skin or jowl laxity, facial volume loss, or lower eyelid anatomy. In the photo, there appears to be early lower-face heaviness and some under-eye/cheek transition, but the image is limited and cannot show skin quality or neck laxity well enough to choose a procedure.
Sculptra and RF microneedling can help skin quality and subtle volume, but they will not lift loose tissue the way surgery can. If the main issue is lower-face or jawline laxity, a mini or lower facelift may be more durable; if the tired look is lower eyelid hollowness or bags, a lower blepharoplasty or fat repositioning may be more relevant. An in-person exam is the safest way to avoid spending on treatments that do not match the anatomy.

42 - is it time for a facelift? (Photo)

Answers (14)

More Facelift Questions

Skin laxity and volume loss in my face post menopause and weight loss - Lower facelift candidate? (Photos)

SMAS facelift and vertical forehead lift 2 years ago - How do I lift the saggy midface?

One year post SMAS facelift - how can I fix the jaw and under chin area? (Photos)

56, very fit and healthy - Am I a facelift candidate? (Photos)

28, female, lower face drooping - Should i get a face lift?

40, female - Timeline for facelift? (Photos)

WE SEND PRETTY
EMAILS