What are the difference between Cool Advantage and the old sculpting way which takes longer time.
Answer: Differences between the CoolSclupting applicators Thank you for your question. Same efficacy - 20-25% average reduction of fat, however, with the CoolAdvantage applicators you are treating a larger surface area in almost half the time and with 45% reduction in bruising. We have seen a huge reduction in side effects with using the CoolAdvantage applicators. The larger surface area technically means more area treated but that is relative to who is being treated. Each person had different needs and depending on the patient's body, the traditional applicators might be a better fit, therefore, a better result than the CoolAdvantage. The sizing differences are below; Traditional CoolCore/Curve/Fit 110 sq. cm CoolAdvantage Core/Curve/Fit 122 sq. cm CoolMax 275 sq. cm CoolAdvantage Plus 201 sq. cm
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Differences between the CoolSclupting applicators Thank you for your question. Same efficacy - 20-25% average reduction of fat, however, with the CoolAdvantage applicators you are treating a larger surface area in almost half the time and with 45% reduction in bruising. We have seen a huge reduction in side effects with using the CoolAdvantage applicators. The larger surface area technically means more area treated but that is relative to who is being treated. Each person had different needs and depending on the patient's body, the traditional applicators might be a better fit, therefore, a better result than the CoolAdvantage. The sizing differences are below; Traditional CoolCore/Curve/Fit 110 sq. cm CoolAdvantage Core/Curve/Fit 122 sq. cm CoolMax 275 sq. cm CoolAdvantage Plus 201 sq. cm
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Does CoolAdvantage Have Better Results Than Older CoolSculpting? CoolAdvantage Is Faster, More Comfortable, and Treats Larger Ar The CoolAdvantage applicator has several improvements over the original CoolSculpting: 1) Less suction is required, for greater comfort; 2) Treatment only takes 35 minutes v. almost an hour with original CoolSculpting; 3) CoolAdvantage treats larger areas, further shortening treatment time. Both applicators remove between 20% and 35% of fat during one session. The larger number occurs when you follow CoolSculpting with a Zimmer Z-wave radial pulsed therapy massage. Be sure to consult a board-certified dermatologist who is certified by Zeltiq to perform CoolSculpting body contouring.
Helpful
Answer: Does CoolAdvantage Have Better Results Than Older CoolSculpting? CoolAdvantage Is Faster, More Comfortable, and Treats Larger Ar The CoolAdvantage applicator has several improvements over the original CoolSculpting: 1) Less suction is required, for greater comfort; 2) Treatment only takes 35 minutes v. almost an hour with original CoolSculpting; 3) CoolAdvantage treats larger areas, further shortening treatment time. Both applicators remove between 20% and 35% of fat during one session. The larger number occurs when you follow CoolSculpting with a Zimmer Z-wave radial pulsed therapy massage. Be sure to consult a board-certified dermatologist who is certified by Zeltiq to perform CoolSculpting body contouring.
Helpful
January 19, 2018
Answer: New CoolsSculpting applicators The major advantage of the CoolAdvantage is time of treatment. Also, the overall patient experience is more comfortable with the new applicators. We haven't seen a big difference in overall outcomes but it has been reported that there is a slightly larger surface area of treatment.
Helpful
January 19, 2018
Answer: New CoolsSculpting applicators The major advantage of the CoolAdvantage is time of treatment. Also, the overall patient experience is more comfortable with the new applicators. We haven't seen a big difference in overall outcomes but it has been reported that there is a slightly larger surface area of treatment.
Helpful
January 16, 2018
Answer: Does CoolAdvantage (35minutes) have better results than the old applicator CoolSculpting (1hr)? Hello and thank you for your question. The CoolAdvantage applicator is just as effective as the original applicator, but is able to reduce treatment time by almost half. The new technology in the CoolAdvantage applicator brings the temperature down the necessary 36 degrees F faster, causing fat cell necrosis quicker while delivering the same results as before. I hope this information helps and I wish you the best of luck.
Helpful
January 16, 2018
Answer: Does CoolAdvantage (35minutes) have better results than the old applicator CoolSculpting (1hr)? Hello and thank you for your question. The CoolAdvantage applicator is just as effective as the original applicator, but is able to reduce treatment time by almost half. The new technology in the CoolAdvantage applicator brings the temperature down the necessary 36 degrees F faster, causing fat cell necrosis quicker while delivering the same results as before. I hope this information helps and I wish you the best of luck.
Helpful
January 15, 2018
Answer: CoolAdvantage Applicators vs. Standard CoolSculpting Applicators The CoolAdvantage applicators treat one degree cooler than the traditional applicators. For this reason, treatment time is decreased from 1 hour to 35 minutes. The whole surface of the applicator provides cooling, therefore, less suction is needed and discomfort is less than the older applicators. Results are basically the same with the two applicators. However, not everyone is an appropriate candidate for the CoolAdvantage applicators and in some people the older applicators work better. This is why it is important that you are under the care of an experienced physician who can determine which applicators would be best for you. Hope this helps answer your question!
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
January 15, 2018
Answer: CoolAdvantage Applicators vs. Standard CoolSculpting Applicators The CoolAdvantage applicators treat one degree cooler than the traditional applicators. For this reason, treatment time is decreased from 1 hour to 35 minutes. The whole surface of the applicator provides cooling, therefore, less suction is needed and discomfort is less than the older applicators. Results are basically the same with the two applicators. However, not everyone is an appropriate candidate for the CoolAdvantage applicators and in some people the older applicators work better. This is why it is important that you are under the care of an experienced physician who can determine which applicators would be best for you. Hope this helps answer your question!
Helpful 1 person found this helpful