What does it mean when people say that the fat may calcify after a fat transfer? Will it be able to be seen or felt by others? In general, will the breast be misshapen? or is the concern only in mammograms?? Should I trust a cosmetic surgeon as opposed to a plastic surgeon in this procedure? And for those who know about the procedure, is it ok to exercise after the procedure since I do alot of exercise normally? I have little body fat Ive been told, about 12% or 10 pounds of it. Is this enough for 1 cup?
March 23, 2010
Answer: Fat grafting for breast enlargement - is it really safe? Fat Grafting to the breast has been a controversial topic for over 20 years and still remains controversial. The main concern with Fat Grafting to the breast is that the fat cells which do not survive can result in calcifications which show up on Mammograms. This does not always happen, and in no way are they related to cancer, but they may make cancer detection on mammograms confusing or more difficult because they look similar to the calcifications that are a sign of cancer. Many experts say they can tell the difference between fat grafting calcifications and cancer calcifications, but my concern would be the "Non-Experts". One out of 9 american women develop breast cancer and mammograms are currently our best test for early detection. In my opinion, breast implants are a very good and much safer alternative.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
March 23, 2010
Answer: Fat grafting for breast enlargement - is it really safe? Fat Grafting to the breast has been a controversial topic for over 20 years and still remains controversial. The main concern with Fat Grafting to the breast is that the fat cells which do not survive can result in calcifications which show up on Mammograms. This does not always happen, and in no way are they related to cancer, but they may make cancer detection on mammograms confusing or more difficult because they look similar to the calcifications that are a sign of cancer. Many experts say they can tell the difference between fat grafting calcifications and cancer calcifications, but my concern would be the "Non-Experts". One out of 9 american women develop breast cancer and mammograms are currently our best test for early detection. In my opinion, breast implants are a very good and much safer alternative.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
March 22, 2010
Answer: Meaning of Calcifications after Fat Transfer to the Breast One out of 11 American women will develop breast cancer. That is a HUGE number. Just look at your co-workers and imagine how many in that group will develop that disease. Next - the most commonly used method to TRY and pick breast cancer is a mammogram. Many breast cancers grow so quickly that portions of the tumor actually die and are replaced with small clumps of calcium surrounded by scar tissue. ONLY trained eyes of Radiologists can diagnose classic microcalcifications of the breast as cancerous. Other cancers apparently do not bother reading the books and may appear in other forms which are NOT "classic". When fat dies, the process of healing and resorption often leads to scar tissue and calcifications which to some may appear similar to those of breast cancer. While some may protest and say that microcalcifications of cancer are quite different than other calcifications, that is NOT always the case. Moreover, if the prospect of multiple "false positive" scares and needless breast biopsies does not scare you consider the importance and likelihood of benign, fat grafting calcifications potentially hiding those of "real" breast cancer calcifications in a cancer prone organ. Personally, I would NOT get fat grafting to the breast and would especially stay away from anyone who is NOT an member of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons -www.PlasticSurgery.org.
Helpful
March 22, 2010
Answer: Meaning of Calcifications after Fat Transfer to the Breast One out of 11 American women will develop breast cancer. That is a HUGE number. Just look at your co-workers and imagine how many in that group will develop that disease. Next - the most commonly used method to TRY and pick breast cancer is a mammogram. Many breast cancers grow so quickly that portions of the tumor actually die and are replaced with small clumps of calcium surrounded by scar tissue. ONLY trained eyes of Radiologists can diagnose classic microcalcifications of the breast as cancerous. Other cancers apparently do not bother reading the books and may appear in other forms which are NOT "classic". When fat dies, the process of healing and resorption often leads to scar tissue and calcifications which to some may appear similar to those of breast cancer. While some may protest and say that microcalcifications of cancer are quite different than other calcifications, that is NOT always the case. Moreover, if the prospect of multiple "false positive" scares and needless breast biopsies does not scare you consider the importance and likelihood of benign, fat grafting calcifications potentially hiding those of "real" breast cancer calcifications in a cancer prone organ. Personally, I would NOT get fat grafting to the breast and would especially stay away from anyone who is NOT an member of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons -www.PlasticSurgery.org.
Helpful