The deep plane face lift extensively dissects under the superficial muscle and platysma layer of the face. The method was developed as an alternative to a method called SMAS plication where the deep plane support is performed using sutures to support the SMAS rather than carrying out a surgical dissection under this plane. The deep plane dissection exposes the nerves that supply the facial muscle to direct injury. Even in the best hands, this risk is real and can be seen in as many as 3 to 5% of cases. The SMAS plication is not associated with the risk of motor nerve injury as it does not expose these nerve to risk. Surgical procedures run in fades and the deep plane face lift because immensely popular among surgeons. Unfortunately, it is an open question if the risk of the deep plane face lift is balanced by a better long term facelift result. Several studies have look at this specific question. The answer is that the SMAS plication facelift, in experienced hands, is associated with higher long term satisfaction that the deep plane face lift. The plane of the surgery is one issue, but there are also other factors that make for a satisfactory facelift. This includes the tailoring (or lack thereof) of the surgical closure around the ears. Does the surgeon also address the neck cords (part of a face/neck lift). Like so many things in surgery, the technique is not the most important factor, it is the artistry of the surgeon, their attention to details, and their sensitivity to aesthetic nuance. It is not as simple as picking a particular surgeon based on which facelift technique they use, unfortunately.