There is absolutely never an indication for over the muscle implants. It is a very old fashioned approach. The edges of the implants are more visible, the implants are in contact with the breast tissue so the risk of capsular contracture is higher, the interference with mammography is worse, there is less support for the implants so they sag faster and more severely, the rippling risk is higher, the infection risk is higher, once they are in this position it is nearly impossible to switch them to under. A surgeon that recommends this approach is indicating their judgement, experience, skill, knowledge, and training. I would be careful about this decision. You cannot take this one back.In addition, you are a perfect candidate for a breast augmentation. You would have an outstanding outcome. Under the muscle every time in 2016. Over the muscle every time in 1965. There are many advantages to sub muscular dual plane placement and very many disadvantages to sub glandular placement. I would see no indication to do anything but sub muscular. This can be best accomplished with the armpit approach. The most sophisticated approach to breast augmentation is through the armpit with a surgical camera (transaxillary endoscopic). Using this modern approach the space can be crafted under direct vision, with virtually no bleeding and no postoperative bruising. Most importantly, the shape of the breast is meticulously created. The other, older methods of insertion are technologically less advanced. Both silicone and saline implants can be placed through the armpit by a surgeon with skill and experience using this approach. The incision in the crease is the oldest method of placing the implants and puts a scar directly on the breast. Subglandular silicone implant placement is the historical approach to this surgery, and was widely used in the 1960's. The implant edges are more visible, the risk of rippling is higher, the implant is in contact with the non-sterile breast tissue so the risk of infection and capsular contracture is higher. The interface between the breast tissue and the muscle is blurred so the implant interferes with mammography more than sub muscular placement. The blood supply surrounding the implant is worse so the risk of capsular contracture is higher. The support for the implant is less so there is more long term shape abnormalities and sagging. The look of a sub glandular implant is much less appealing than a sub muscular implant. The placement of sub glandular implants makes any subsequent revision surgeries more complicated and less successful. There are no advantages to sub glandular implant placement.