There are numerous facelift techniques and when performed correctly on the right candidates they seem to be relatively equivalent, though the comparison has so many variables that it is really hard to objectively compare. Even on identical twin studies, factors such as skin quality, sun exposure and smoking directly affect the result long term. When comparing facelift techniques, the majority are safe when performed by an experienced plastic surgeon. Most plastic surgeons will rely on one or two techniques primarily and refine their techniques based on their comfort level. Caution should be given to the plastic surgeon who is constantly changing techniques. That directly leads into what technique is more natural, and when the aging face is repositioned correctly and harmoniously which addresses the neck, jaw line, vertical midface lift, correction of the lower lid and excess upper eyelid skin and brow position, the face will be set up for a natural result no matter what technique is used. With the manipulation of the SMAS with repositioning rather than pulling, the facelift will last. I prefer a High SMAS technique which involves a deeper SMAS release, but enables a vertical vector of repositioning that lasts. I actually see the facial nerves and know what plane I am in, which helps to limit the risk of nerve injury. When performed correctly this does deliver a natural and more importantly predictable facial rejuvenation.