I am a 43 year old 113 lb., 5'4", fit female who wishes to get rid of my abdominal fat. I wish to lose 2-3 inches in abdominal circumference and can definitely pinch my fat to make a roll. Which procedure would be better for me: Ultrashape or Coolsculpting?
June 23, 2016
Answer: We use both Ultrashape and CoolSculpting to reduce fat in our NYC practice All patients see me in consultation so that I can examine them and determine which of the two procedures, CoolSculpting or Ultrashape, is best suited for their physique. I use templates to measure which applicators can be used on different body sites. CoolSculpting has evolved into a sculpting process by overlapping multiple applicators to reduce the fat optimally. However, some body sites aren't amenable to have the CoolSculpting applicator fit snugly and in these cases Ultrashape may be able to treat the area better. CoolSculpting may need one or two treatments, sometimes more, to provide a good result in good candidates, whereas Ultrashape is designed to be done as a series of three treatments. Visible effects may show more quickly after Ultrashape than with CoolSculpting because there is some swelling after CoolSculpting that disguises the fat loss. Ultrashape is relatively painless, and CoolSculpting has a weird uncomfortable sensation the first five minutes until the fat becomes frozen and then the rest of the hour's cycle is usually very comfortable.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
June 23, 2016
Answer: We use both Ultrashape and CoolSculpting to reduce fat in our NYC practice All patients see me in consultation so that I can examine them and determine which of the two procedures, CoolSculpting or Ultrashape, is best suited for their physique. I use templates to measure which applicators can be used on different body sites. CoolSculpting has evolved into a sculpting process by overlapping multiple applicators to reduce the fat optimally. However, some body sites aren't amenable to have the CoolSculpting applicator fit snugly and in these cases Ultrashape may be able to treat the area better. CoolSculpting may need one or two treatments, sometimes more, to provide a good result in good candidates, whereas Ultrashape is designed to be done as a series of three treatments. Visible effects may show more quickly after Ultrashape than with CoolSculpting because there is some swelling after CoolSculpting that disguises the fat loss. Ultrashape is relatively painless, and CoolSculpting has a weird uncomfortable sensation the first five minutes until the fat becomes frozen and then the rest of the hour's cycle is usually very comfortable.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: UltraShape vs. CoolSculpting? I'd Go With UltraShape Both UltraShape and CoolSculpting are effective, noninvasive means of permanently eliminating stubborn fat. I happen to prefer UltraShape because it's fast and has absolutely no downtime. UltraShape zaps fat with pulses of ultrasound energy. The fat cells are instantly vaporized and the body then gradually eliminates them over the next 1.5 to 2 months. Some of your results may be visible after only two weeks. You will probably need at least three sessions, but each session only lasts from 15 to 45 minutes. A board-certified dermatologist will be able to evaluate you to see if you are a candidate for UltraShape.
Helpful
Answer: UltraShape vs. CoolSculpting? I'd Go With UltraShape Both UltraShape and CoolSculpting are effective, noninvasive means of permanently eliminating stubborn fat. I happen to prefer UltraShape because it's fast and has absolutely no downtime. UltraShape zaps fat with pulses of ultrasound energy. The fat cells are instantly vaporized and the body then gradually eliminates them over the next 1.5 to 2 months. Some of your results may be visible after only two weeks. You will probably need at least three sessions, but each session only lasts from 15 to 45 minutes. A board-certified dermatologist will be able to evaluate you to see if you are a candidate for UltraShape.
Helpful
