What Are the Pros and Cons of Getting a Nasal Implant Versus Cartilage Grafting?

It is a little more complicated than just implant vs. cartilage because there is more than one type of implant material. Each one has it own pros and cons and surgeons tend to work with the implant material they have the most experience with. To able to make an informed choice you need to consult with a qualified surgeon face to face, actually see the different materials, have the surgeon go over the different implants and cartilage pros and cons and then you choose which you want. You cannot do that online in this forum.

I hope you realize that this format of posting questions and receiving answers lacks the face to face direct communication required for you to make an informed decision regarding your surgery.

My response to your question/post does not represent formal medical advice or constitute a doctor patient relationship. You need to consult with i.e. personally see a board certified plastic surgeon in order to receive a formal evaluation and develop a doctor patient relationship.

Over more than 35 years of rhinoplasty I have only used the patient's tissue and never had an infection. Therefore, I see no reason to take the risk of possible infection using a foreign material.

It is always best to have the patient’s own cartilage implanted in the nose rather than a synthetic implant with the exception of Asian rhinoplasty and very large dorsal augmentation requirements.  A synthetic implant such as silastic is an excellent implant and is well tolerated in the body but there is always the extremely rare chance that it can get infected.  Small to moderate augmentations are usually done with the patient’s own cartilage while moderate to significant augmentations of the bridge are performed with silastic synthetic implants.