What Are the Advantages of Closed Revision Rhinoplasty Versus Open Revision Rhinoplasty?

The method chosen depends upon the severity of the deformity.  In general, only minor, focal deformities are amenable to closed revisions while the majority will require an open approach.  The open approach allows greater visibility and easier cartilage grafting.

Closed rhinoplasty has less tissue dissection and may have less swelling post op. The question is more what result you are looking for and if the surgeon feels comfortable that he can achieve that result with this approach. If he/she is more comfortable with an open approach and thinks it will be a more predictable result then follow his recommendation.

Whether a surgeon choses open or closed techniques for revision depends largely on the surgeon's, training, experience, and preference.  The open approach allows for direct vision and easier placement of grafts.  The closed approach has the advantage of disrupting less of the scar tissue and skin which may be helpful in certain instances.

Another great option to consider is using dermafillers for revision rhinoplasty.  Dermafillers are excellent at achieving excellent contour results.  Non-surgical rhinoplasty techniques for revision also avoids much of the trauma and therefore some of the risks involved with revision rhinoplasty.

The fillers last 6-9 months, but there is often a cumulative effect from having the skin supported over time.  The results tend to last longer and longer and there are times when a permanent filler like ArteFill may be used.