Unfortunately much more information is needed to answer this question. Multiple factors effect buttock projection after implants: 1) not only the implant size (volume, "ccs") but more importantly implant thickness, 2) tissue quality and quantity on the patient, and 3) positioning of the implant under/within gluteus muscle or, incorrectly, on top of the muscle. Also, there is mass confusion about the (potential) projection of "oval implants" vs "round implants". Well, (Stanton Anatomic) oval implants can and are made with the same projection as their similar volume round counterparts. The shape of the implant has absolutely nothing to do with the maximum projection of the implant. The main reason confusion still exists is because the old/traditional "oval implants" were/are actually tear-drop shaped with the maximum projection point at the bottom (lower pole) of the implant instead of the center of the implant like Stanton Anatomic and round buttock implants. In otherwords, the old tear-drop oval implants lack upper pole buttock projection and that swoop/pop that many patients desire Flad to help.