I have chosen 550 cc high profile gel, and Dr. recommended subfascial placement. I have heard you lose some of the look of the size when your implant is placed in a subpectoral position. Since I love the look of 550 cc, should I bump it up to 600 cc in order to compensate for possible size disappearance from the implants being placed in my body? Here is a pic of me with 550 cc sizers and also my wish pic. I'm 5'5" 130 lbs and I do understand the implants I want are on the larger side.
Answer: Breast Augmentation Hi Bearbear,Your body's tissue will compress your implants slightly, regardless of which placement you use. Most PS upsize by 25-50 cc over your desired size. However, you are getting pretty big is you go up to 575 or even 600, so check with your PS directly about your personal dimensional analysis. Many PS around the world favor the subfascial placement. Happy Holidays, Dr. Joe
Helpful
Answer: Breast Augmentation Hi Bearbear,Your body's tissue will compress your implants slightly, regardless of which placement you use. Most PS upsize by 25-50 cc over your desired size. However, you are getting pretty big is you go up to 575 or even 600, so check with your PS directly about your personal dimensional analysis. Many PS around the world favor the subfascial placement. Happy Holidays, Dr. Joe
Helpful
December 21, 2014
Answer: Implant volume subfascial vs subpectoral The actual volume of the implant will be identical no matter where it is placed. The wish pics you posted do show high, round breasts that look obviously augmented, and it appears that the implant outline is visible. This look might be more achievable if the implants are subfascial since there will be less tissue coverage. On the other hand, if you are choosing very large implants there will already be an increased risk of visible rippling so putting the implants under the muscle may be a better option because it will provide a little more coverage. Your plastic surgeon will help you understand the pros and cons of each pocket.
Helpful
December 21, 2014
Answer: Implant volume subfascial vs subpectoral The actual volume of the implant will be identical no matter where it is placed. The wish pics you posted do show high, round breasts that look obviously augmented, and it appears that the implant outline is visible. This look might be more achievable if the implants are subfascial since there will be less tissue coverage. On the other hand, if you are choosing very large implants there will already be an increased risk of visible rippling so putting the implants under the muscle may be a better option because it will provide a little more coverage. Your plastic surgeon will help you understand the pros and cons of each pocket.
Helpful
December 22, 2014
Answer: Subfascial vs subpectoral I do not see any advantage to place implant subfascial. This is basically the same as subglandular. I prefer submuscular.
Helpful
December 22, 2014
Answer: Subfascial vs subpectoral I do not see any advantage to place implant subfascial. This is basically the same as subglandular. I prefer submuscular.
Helpful
December 22, 2014
Answer: Breast implant volume questions Implant position may affect the appearance and projection of the breast tissue but the overall volume is still the same regardless of the placement(subglandular, subfascial or subpectoral). The choice for placement is usually determined by the thickness and quality of the overlying upper breast tissue and whether or not there is any drop or ptosis of the breast. Implants placed under the pectoral muscle may seem slightly smaller due to the compressive effect of the pectoral muscle and will project less for that reason (this problem can be minimized by release of the lower pectoral muscle during surgery). The fascia of the pectorals is quite thin and should not result in any significant reduction in the appearance of the implant volume.
Helpful
December 22, 2014
Answer: Breast implant volume questions Implant position may affect the appearance and projection of the breast tissue but the overall volume is still the same regardless of the placement(subglandular, subfascial or subpectoral). The choice for placement is usually determined by the thickness and quality of the overlying upper breast tissue and whether or not there is any drop or ptosis of the breast. Implants placed under the pectoral muscle may seem slightly smaller due to the compressive effect of the pectoral muscle and will project less for that reason (this problem can be minimized by release of the lower pectoral muscle during surgery). The fascia of the pectorals is quite thin and should not result in any significant reduction in the appearance of the implant volume.
Helpful
December 21, 2014
Answer: Do you lose implant volume when you place implants in a subfascial position just as you would in a subpectoral position? (Photo) It is common misinformation that an implant has less volume when placed under the muscle. There is no study that actually measured this and it is really not possible since neither saline nor silicone lose volume when compressed (unlike a sponge which gets smaller with compression). Furthermore, if it was true, it would depend on the amount of muscle coverage (Dual Plane 1, 2, or 3) and also on compression due to skin tightness. Discuss with your surgeon to make sure your implant has proper dimesions for your chest & breast.
Helpful
December 21, 2014
Answer: Do you lose implant volume when you place implants in a subfascial position just as you would in a subpectoral position? (Photo) It is common misinformation that an implant has less volume when placed under the muscle. There is no study that actually measured this and it is really not possible since neither saline nor silicone lose volume when compressed (unlike a sponge which gets smaller with compression). Furthermore, if it was true, it would depend on the amount of muscle coverage (Dual Plane 1, 2, or 3) and also on compression due to skin tightness. Discuss with your surgeon to make sure your implant has proper dimesions for your chest & breast.
Helpful
