There is ongoing debate among physicians regarding the use of fillers for nasolabial folds, largely due to differences in training, experience, and individual patient factors. High-quality evidence, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses, demonstrates that hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are effective and generally safe for improving nasolabial folds, with significant reductions in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores maintained for up to 12 months after treatment. Most patients experience satisfactory results, and adverse events are typically mild and transient, such as swelling, bruising, or tenderness. However, rare but serious complications—such as vascular occlusion—can occur, especially in this anatomically complex area, underscoring the importance of injector expertise and proper technique. Some physicians are enthusiastic about nasolabial fold fillers due to their reversibility, immediate results, and favorable safety profile when performed by experienced injectors. Others are more cautious, citing the risk of unnatural appearance, the need for ongoing maintenance, and the potential for complications, particularly in patients with thin skin, deep dynamic folds, or unique anatomical considerations. Additionally, evolving aesthetic philosophies and cultural preferences may influence recommendations, as well as the increasing diversity of patient populations, which may require tailored approaches. Ultimately, the discrepancy reflects a balance between evidence-based benefits, individual risk tolerance, and the provider’s clinical judgment. Patients should be evaluated holistically, with a personalized plan that considers anatomy, expectations, and alternative treatments. A thorough discussion of risks, benefits, and realistic outcomes is essential for optimal patient satisfaction and safety.