What are some of the negatives about completely removing the hair from down there? I read an article that stated there's a higher risk of STIs? Also, I will only be getting 6 sessions done, and I know with hormones changing over time it can cause the hair to grow back, is that true?
December 14, 2016
Answer: Brazilian bikini laser hair removal There is no basis for the statement that STIs are higher in those who have laser hair removal sessions in bikini area. By removing the pubic hair by whatever method, pubic area skin is more likely to come in direct contact with the the other person's skin (if that person also has no pubic hair) who might have an active infection in that area, like genital herpes, syphilis, LGV, warts or molluscum contagiosum. On the other hand the person who has no pubic hair is less likely to get Pubic lice ("crabs"?) from the other person. In other words any concomitant increase in STIs is not a direct result of laser treatment, but indirect result from resulting hairless skin being exposed. Hope that clarifies. In our facility we have been able to achieve more than 90% reduction with about 5 Brazilian Bikini laser treatments in most individuals; more than 95% of people are very happy with the results. Unlike the facial hair in women, bikini hair is not so much hormone-dependent, and hence there is unlikely to be any effect from hormonal issues in this area of the body. Skin will become a lot smoother, with less bumps and elimination of ingrown hair and hence its worth it. However you might need a touch up maintenance sessions once in a while. So not to expect that you would have 6 sessions and done for life! A touch up session once in a while is not an inconvenience.
Helpful
December 14, 2016
Answer: Brazilian bikini laser hair removal There is no basis for the statement that STIs are higher in those who have laser hair removal sessions in bikini area. By removing the pubic hair by whatever method, pubic area skin is more likely to come in direct contact with the the other person's skin (if that person also has no pubic hair) who might have an active infection in that area, like genital herpes, syphilis, LGV, warts or molluscum contagiosum. On the other hand the person who has no pubic hair is less likely to get Pubic lice ("crabs"?) from the other person. In other words any concomitant increase in STIs is not a direct result of laser treatment, but indirect result from resulting hairless skin being exposed. Hope that clarifies. In our facility we have been able to achieve more than 90% reduction with about 5 Brazilian Bikini laser treatments in most individuals; more than 95% of people are very happy with the results. Unlike the facial hair in women, bikini hair is not so much hormone-dependent, and hence there is unlikely to be any effect from hormonal issues in this area of the body. Skin will become a lot smoother, with less bumps and elimination of ingrown hair and hence its worth it. However you might need a touch up maintenance sessions once in a while. So not to expect that you would have 6 sessions and done for life! A touch up session once in a while is not an inconvenience.
Helpful
December 14, 2016
Answer: The negatives of pubic laser hair removal The article stating there are more STDs after hair removal is related to the fact that people who do this procedure are more sexually active and has nothing to do with the procedure. 6 sessions is usually enough for most people but more might be needed. Also, touch ups are needed every 6 months in most people. There are risks with burns and pigmentation changes with all lasers.
Helpful
December 14, 2016
Answer: The negatives of pubic laser hair removal The article stating there are more STDs after hair removal is related to the fact that people who do this procedure are more sexually active and has nothing to do with the procedure. 6 sessions is usually enough for most people but more might be needed. Also, touch ups are needed every 6 months in most people. There are risks with burns and pigmentation changes with all lasers.
Helpful
