I like the lower fullness dual planing provides but it seems like leaving the lower portion of the muscle untethered would cause complications down the line? Can someone better explain the process and differences please?
February 15, 2019
Answer: Is there any long term negative effect of a dual plane breast augmentation vs. regular submuscular? Thank you for the question. Semantics can be confusing. When surgeons talk about placing breast implants "behind the muscle", they are usually referring to "partial" or "dual plane" positioning. In other words, all of these terms refer to the same sub muscular (as opposed to sub glandular positioning) positioning of breast implants. Complete submuscular placement of breast implants would be very unusual. Dual plane breast augmentation refers to the technique where breast implants are placed under the muscle superiorly and in the sub glandular position inferiorly. I think this is the best way to go for most patients. On the one hand, patients benefit from the sub muscular position with increased tissue coverage of the breast implant, less chance of encapsulation, less potential for rippling/palpability of the implants and less interference with mammography. On the other hand, because the implants are not completely sub muscular there is the potential for less “distortion” of the breast implants with pectoralis movement. Generally, in my opinion, the breasts also look better with breast implants in this position. I hope this helps.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
February 15, 2019
Answer: Is there any long term negative effect of a dual plane breast augmentation vs. regular submuscular? Thank you for the question. Semantics can be confusing. When surgeons talk about placing breast implants "behind the muscle", they are usually referring to "partial" or "dual plane" positioning. In other words, all of these terms refer to the same sub muscular (as opposed to sub glandular positioning) positioning of breast implants. Complete submuscular placement of breast implants would be very unusual. Dual plane breast augmentation refers to the technique where breast implants are placed under the muscle superiorly and in the sub glandular position inferiorly. I think this is the best way to go for most patients. On the one hand, patients benefit from the sub muscular position with increased tissue coverage of the breast implant, less chance of encapsulation, less potential for rippling/palpability of the implants and less interference with mammography. On the other hand, because the implants are not completely sub muscular there is the potential for less “distortion” of the breast implants with pectoralis movement. Generally, in my opinion, the breasts also look better with breast implants in this position. I hope this helps.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
February 15, 2019
Answer: Dual Plane Breast Augmentation Dual plane breast augmentation refers to the amount of interface the implant has with the pectoralis muscle and the breast tissue. Dual Plane I is how many surgeons perform routine breast augmentation where the muscle is release 1cm or so up from its insertion on the chest wall but not from the sternum. This allows the implant to be in contact mostly with the muscle and interface with the breast tissue only in the lower part of the breast. Dual Plane II and III involve letting the muscle slide up to the level of the nipple and above the nipple respectively. This allows for increasingly more implant-breast tissue interface in both types. Good results are possible with all three techniques, and like all surgical choices, there are pros and cons to each. I recommend discussing the choices with your surgeon to hear what he or she thinks is best for you.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
February 15, 2019
Answer: Dual Plane Breast Augmentation Dual plane breast augmentation refers to the amount of interface the implant has with the pectoralis muscle and the breast tissue. Dual Plane I is how many surgeons perform routine breast augmentation where the muscle is release 1cm or so up from its insertion on the chest wall but not from the sternum. This allows the implant to be in contact mostly with the muscle and interface with the breast tissue only in the lower part of the breast. Dual Plane II and III involve letting the muscle slide up to the level of the nipple and above the nipple respectively. This allows for increasingly more implant-breast tissue interface in both types. Good results are possible with all three techniques, and like all surgical choices, there are pros and cons to each. I recommend discussing the choices with your surgeon to hear what he or she thinks is best for you.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful