I am 37 years old, very fit and active and am seeking a lift with smaller implants (250cc). Pregnancy and childbirth wrecked my breasts and they sag and shrank so the aim is to restore them to their former glory. In my consultation, the dr. recommended over the muscle/subfascial due to my active lifestyle and affinity for lifting weights. I realize this carries a higher risk for capsular contracture. Is this what you would recommend?
August 2, 2024
Answer: Subfascial breast implant placement is a great option The fascia is a thin but strong layer that can be used to form a barrier between the implant and the breast tissue, so it isn't the same as subglandular. Any possible increase in capsular contracture risk is very small. It avoids problems of animation deformity which is a potentially significant problem with weight lifting and sports.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
August 2, 2024
Answer: Subfascial breast implant placement is a great option The fascia is a thin but strong layer that can be used to form a barrier between the implant and the breast tissue, so it isn't the same as subglandular. Any possible increase in capsular contracture risk is very small. It avoids problems of animation deformity which is a potentially significant problem with weight lifting and sports.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Subfascial vs sub-muscular The answer to this question is dependent on a number of factors. One is certainly your lifestyle- for patients who are very active, frequently lift, and are worried about animation deformity- subfascial augmentation can be a great option. However, it is also dependent on anatomy- For those patients with less native breast tissue, a subfascial augmentation will have a greater risk of a more clearly augmented appearance or rippling. If patients have little native breast tissue but are only interested in above the muscle augmentation, fat grafting can be considered to camouflage the implant. Regarding the risk of capsular contracture, we do not have great long-term data regarding rates as compared to submuscular implants. You are correct that when comparing subglandular to sub-muscular implants, there is a higher risk of capsular contracture. Subfascial augmentation may be a great option for you based on lifestyle and a well qualified surgeon should be able to give you an honest assessment based on a focused exam and discussion of your goals. Sean Fisher Aesthetic Plastic Surgeon Seattle, WA
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Subfascial vs sub-muscular The answer to this question is dependent on a number of factors. One is certainly your lifestyle- for patients who are very active, frequently lift, and are worried about animation deformity- subfascial augmentation can be a great option. However, it is also dependent on anatomy- For those patients with less native breast tissue, a subfascial augmentation will have a greater risk of a more clearly augmented appearance or rippling. If patients have little native breast tissue but are only interested in above the muscle augmentation, fat grafting can be considered to camouflage the implant. Regarding the risk of capsular contracture, we do not have great long-term data regarding rates as compared to submuscular implants. You are correct that when comparing subglandular to sub-muscular implants, there is a higher risk of capsular contracture. Subfascial augmentation may be a great option for you based on lifestyle and a well qualified surgeon should be able to give you an honest assessment based on a focused exam and discussion of your goals. Sean Fisher Aesthetic Plastic Surgeon Seattle, WA
Helpful 1 person found this helpful