Preserve vs Traditional Breast Augmentation, considering surgeon experience what is the best choice?

I am in the process of planning my first breast augmentation, and feeling stuck regarding the techniques my preferred surgeon can offer. One technique, the Preserve breast augmentation (essentially a Motiva surgical kit that is marketed as "tissue sparing") sounds promising and could theoretically avoid general anesthesia altogether. However, the surgeon has far more career cases and overall experience performing the "traditional" method of breast augmentation, over the muscle. This is a surgeon who I vetted and trust, and they felt I would be a reasonable candidate for either due to the smaller size of my desired implants. For me, the choice comes down to a number of things, but the fact this surgeon has only done about 100 cases of Preserve total makes me hesitate somewhat. They didn't seem totally sold on it being any monumentally easier to recover from than their traditional OTM method either. So I am ultimately wondering from the surgeon perspective, whether I should weigh the surgeons experience most heavily over a technique alone.