Collagen Induction Therapy (CIT) and Fraxel Laser treatments seem to work in a similar manner: they create micro injuries to the skin to stimulate collagen production. Is this correct? It would seem CIT would be the preferred treatment because it does not destroy cells like the Fraxel treatment. I'm interested in knowing CIT effects on acne scars, which I assume are mostly localized collagen loss? Please comment on these assumptions.
Answers (3)
From board-certified doctors and trusted medical professionals
VOTED MOST HELPFUL
March 18, 2018
Answer: Fraxel Repair is superior in acne scar treatment
For a 68-year-old patient with controlled systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), microneedling is generally the safer choice over Moxi (1927 nm thulium laser) for collagen induction and skin rejuvenation.
Patients with SLE are at increased risk for photosensitivity and post-inflammatory...
Fractional laser is an amazing and highly effective treatment in our office. We use the laser treatment to help with acne scars, large pores, fine wrinkles, tissue collagen loss, scars, sebaceous hyperplasia, active acne, and for brightening dark pigmentation. Although there are very strong...
When considering microneedling, especially with a history of keloid scars, it's important to approach the decision with caution and seek professional medical advice.
Microneedling involves creating controlled micro-injuries to the skin to stimulate collagen production and improve skin texture....